The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting uncertainty in forecasts of weather and climate
Open accessAbstract
The predictability of weather and climate forecasts is determined by the projection of uncertainties in both initial conditions and model formulation onto flow-dependent instabilities of the chaotic climate attractor. Since it is essential to be able to estimate the impact of such uncertainties on forecast accuracy, no weather or climate prediction can be considered complete without a forecast of the associated flow-dependent predictability. The problem of predicting uncertainty can be posed in terms of the Liouville equation for the growth of initial uncertainty, or a form of Fokker-Planck equation if model uncertainties are also taken into account. However, in practice, the problem is approached using ensembles of integrations of comprehensive weather and climate prediction models, with explicit perturbations to both initial conditions and model formulation; the resulting ensemble of forecasts can be interpreted as a probabilistic prediction. Many of the difficulties in forecasting predictability arise from the large dimensionality of the climate system, and special techniques to generate ensemble perturbations have been developed. Special emphasis is placed on the use of singular-vector methods to determine the linearly-unstable component of the initial probability density function. Methods to sample uncertainties in model formulation are also described. Practical ensemble prediction systems for prediction on timescales of days (weather forecasts), seasons (including predictions of El Niño) and decades (including climate change projections) are described, and examples of resulting probabilistic forecast products shown. Methods to evaluate the skill of these probabilistic forecasts are outlined. By using ensemble forecasts as input to a simple decision-model analysis, it is shown that probability forecasts of weather and climate have greater potential economic value than corresponding single deterministic forecasts with uncertain accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evensen, G. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc00572 · Cited by 5,371
Century-scale effects of increased atmospheric C02 on the ocean–atmosphere system
Manabe, S., & Stouffer, R. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/364215a0 · Cited by 490
Cited by
Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle
Allen, M. R., & Ingram, W. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01092 · Cited by 3,009
Seasonal climate predictability and forecasting: status and prospects
Doblas‐Reyes, F. J., García‐Serrano, J., Lienert, F., Biescas, A. P., & Rodrigues, L. R. L. (2013) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.217 · Cited by 478
Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions.
Stainforth, D. A., Allen, M. R., Tredger, E. R., & Smith, L. A. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2074 · Cited by 464
Palmer, T. N. (2001) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49712757202 · Cited by 466
Self-citationStephenson, D. B., Coelho, C. A. S., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., & Balmaseda, M. (2005) · Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.3402/tellusa.v57i3.14664 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Palmer, T. N.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2000-01-18
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 71-116
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2072319095
- Cited by
- 446
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting uncertainty in forecasts of weather and climate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/63/2/201
- The paper
- Palmer, T. N. (2000). Predicting uncertainty in forecasts of weather and climate. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/63/2/201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.