The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electronic transport properties of conducting polymers and carbon nanotubes
Open accessAbstract
We review and compare electronic transport in different types of conducting polymer: conjugated organic polymers, the inorganic polymer polysulphur nitride, alkali-metal fulleride polymers, and carbon nanotubes. In each case, the transport properties show some unusual features compared to conventional metals. In conjugated organic conducting polymers, electronic transport shows a systematic pattern involving both metallic and non-metallic character. We discuss the physical conduction processes that can account for this behaviour. Key roles are played by the metal-semiconductor transition as the doping level is varied, and by the limited size of crystalline regions in the polymers, which gives rise to heterogeneous conduction. Transport data provide indirect evidence that the intrinsic conductivity of doped crystalline polyacetylene, in the absence of disordered regions, is higher than that of copper at room temperature; this high conductivity is consistent with the expected suppression of backscattering in highly anisotropic ('quasi-one-dimensional') metallic conduction. Bundles of single-wall carbon nanotubes have also been found to exhibit metallic behaviour. The temperature dependence of the conductivity of bulk samples is remarkably similar to the pattern characteristic of organic conducting polymers, typically showing a crossover from metallic to non-metallic behaviour as temperature decreases. Quantized one-dimensional conductance and other quantum effects are seen in individual nanotubes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Size, Shape, and Low Energy Electronic Structure of Carbon Nanotubes
Kane, C. L., & Mele, E. J. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.1932 · Cited by 1,048
Cited by
Electrochemistry of Conducting Polymers—Persistent Models and New Concepts
Heinze, J., Frontana-Uribe, B. A., & Ludwigs, S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900226k · Cited by 1,258
Richardson-Burns, S. M., Hendricks, J. L., Foster, B., Povlich, L. K., Kim, D.-H., & Martin, D. C. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.026 · Cited by 503
Electrical Conduction Mechanism in Chemically Derived Graphene Monolayers
Kaiser, A. B., Gómez-Navarro, C., Sundaram, R. S., Burghard, M., & Kern, K. (2009) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl803698b · Cited by 355
Self-citationThermal Transport in Conductive Polymer–Based Materials
Xu, X., Zhou, J., & Chen, J. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201904704 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, A. B.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2000-12-18
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-49
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2052607266
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic transport properties of conducting polymers and carbon nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/64/1/201
- The paper
- Kaiser, A. B. (2001). Electronic transport properties of conducting polymers and carbon nanotubes. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/64/1/201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.