The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reciprocity in optics
Open accessAbstract
The application of reciprocity principles in optics has a long history that goes back to Stokes, Lorentz, Helmholtz and others. Moreover, optical applications need to be seen in the context of applications of reciprocity in particle scattering, acoustics, seismology and the solution of inverse problems, generally. In some of these other fields vector wave propagation is, as it is in optics, of the essence. For this reason the simplified approach to light wave polarization developed by, and named for, Jones is explored initially to see how and to what extent it encompasses reciprocity. The characteristic matrix of a uniform dielectric layer, used in the analysis of interference filters and mirrors, is reciprocal except when the layer is magneto-optical. The way in which the reciprocal nature of a characteristic matrix can be recognized is discussed next. After this, work on the influence of more realistic attributes of a dielectric stack on reciprocity is reviewed. Some of the numerous technological applications of magneto-optic non-reciprocal media are identified and the potential of a new class of non-reciprocal components is briefly introduced. Finally, the extension of the classical reciprocity concept to systems containing components that have nonlinear optical response is briefly mentioned.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods of Theoretical Physics
Morse, P. M., Feshbach, H., & Hill, E. L. (1954) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1933765 · Cited by 13,197
Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes
Allen, L., Beijersbergen, M. W., Spreeuw, R. J. C., & Woerdman, J. P. (1992) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.45.8185 · Cited by 10,455
Cited by
Non-reciprocal photonics based on time modulation
Sounas, D. L., & Alù, A. (2017) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0051-x · Cited by 989
PT-Symmetry Breaking and Laser-Absorber Modes in Optical Scattering Systems
Chong, Y. D., Ge, L., & Stone, A. D. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.093902 · Cited by 980
Optical virtual imaging at 50 nm lateral resolution with a white-light nanoscope
Wang, Z., Guo, W., Li, L., Luk'yanchuk, B., Khan, A., Liu, Z., Chen, Z., & Hong, M. (2011) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1211 · Cited by 827
Probing surface and interface morphology with Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-Ray Scattering
Renaud, G., Lazzari, R., & Leroy, F. (2009) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2009.07.002 · Cited by 756
Non-reciprocal phase transitions
Fruchart, M., Hanai, R., Littlewood, P. B., & Vitelli, V. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03375-9 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Potton, R. J.
- Venue
- Reports on Progress in Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-04-27
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 717-754
- ISSN
- 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6633
- OpenAlex
- W2078628709
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reciprocity in optics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/67/5/r03
- The paper
- Potton, R. J. (2004). Reciprocity in optics. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/67/5/r03
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.