Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultrasound techniques for characterizing colloidal dispersions

Open access
Challis, R E, Povey, M J W, Mather, M L, Holmes, A K·2005·Reports on Progress in Physics

Abstract

Interest in the interaction of acoustic waves with particulate mixtures has a long history—dating back to the work of Rayleigh in the 19th century. This interest has intensified over the last fifteen years as advances in electronics and instrumentation science have brought the possibility of using ultrasound to characterize colloidal mixtures both in the laboratory and in-process, and in both of these contexts a small number of instruments are currently in use. The characterization of colloidal mixtures by ultrasound requires a formal theoretical basis which relates the properties of the mixture, particularly the dispersed phase particle size distribution (PSD), to the complex wavenumber governing propagation. The number of theoretical treatments is vast, having evolved over more than a century. This paper is intended to provide a review of these developments in a form which will enable new researchers in the field to climb a very steep learning curve in a relatively short time. We discuss definitions and production techniques for colloidal mixtures and the basic physical phenomena underlying wave propagation through them. We identify two approaches to the propagation problem— scattering and coupled-phase ; these are treated both separately and comparatively, particularly in relation to limitations that arise when the concentration of particles is high and the basic theories break down. We introduce the basic method for the measurement of PSD and show how dynamic effects such as flocculation and crystallization can be observed and modelled. The core of all ultrasonic characterization procedures is the physical measurement of the ultrasonic wave attenuation coefficient and phase velocity as functions of frequency; here we discuss these techniques on the basis that what is observable or measurable about a colloid depends on both its physical properties and the frequency bandwidth available for measurement. This paper concludes with our view on future developments of measurement technique and theoretical treatments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0034-4885/68/7/r01

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Metadata

Authors
Challis, R. E., Povey, M. J. W., Mather, M. L., & Holmes, A. K.
Venue
Reports on Progress in Physics
Published
2005-06-17
Volume
68
Issue
7
Pages
1541-1637
ISSN
  • 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6633
OpenAlex
W1966544017
Cited by
282
References
88
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound techniques for characterizing colloidal dispersions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/68/7/r01
The paper
Challis, R. E., Povey, M. J. W., Mather, M. L., & Holmes, A. K. (2005). Ultrasound techniques for characterizing colloidal dispersions. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/68/7/r01

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.