Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multi-excitation entropy: its role in thermodynamics and kinetics

Open access
Yelon, A, Movaghar, B, Crandall, R S·2006·Reports on Progress in Physics

Abstract

This review concerns the concept of multi-excitation entropy (MEE) and its consequences. When a fluctuation involving a large number of excitations occurs, for example, when a large activation barrier is overcome, there must be a large entropy associated with this fluctuation. First, the concepts of free energy and entropy, of activated processes and the Arrhenius and Eyring equations are reviewed. The tendency to neglect entropy, whose value is difficult to determine, in modelling kinetic processes, is briefly discussed. We then present a review of the experimental observations of the phenomenon which is variously known as the Compensation Law, the Isokinetic Rule and the Meyer–Neldel Rule (MNR). These observations include examples from chemistry, condensed matter physics, biology and geology. Arguments are then presented for the importance of entropy and particularly of MEE in both kinetics and thermodynamics, when activation energies are large. After a discussion of non-entropic models of compensation, we present results which support the MEE model as an explanation of MNR. The behaviour of systems with low activation energies, or at high temperatures, to which the MEE model does not apply, is then discussed. Several consequences of MEE, including applications to the interpretation of experimental data, particularly the unification of models of dc and ac electrical properties of materials are considered. The high temperature behaviour of systems which obey the MNR at low temperature is then explained, and the idea of a total entropy, of which the MEE is a part, is introduced, as is the correlation between the two empirical parameters encountered in MNR. Finally, these ideas lead to verified predictions of reasonable values of attempt frequencies and cross sections in kinetic processes, which initially appear unreasonable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0034-4885/69/4/r04

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Yelon, A., Movaghar, B., & Crandall, R. S.
Venue
Reports on Progress in Physics
Published
2006-03-13
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
1145-1194
ISSN
  • 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6633
OpenAlex
W2017994093
Cited by
248
References
2
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-excitation entropy: its role in thermodynamics and kinetics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/69/4/r04
The paper
Yelon, A., Movaghar, B., & Crandall, R. S. (2006). Multi-excitation entropy: its role in thermodynamics and kinetics. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/69/4/r04

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.