Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 578

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent advances in the surface forces apparatus (SFA) technique

Israelachvili, J, Min, Y, Akbulut, M, Alig, A, Carver, G, Greene, W, Kristiansen, K, Meyer, E, Pesika, N, Rosenberg, K, Zeng, H·2010·Reports on Progress in Physics

Abstract

The surface forces apparatus (SFA) has been used for many years to measure the physical forces between surfaces, such as van der Waals (including Casimir) and electrostatic forces in vapors and liquids, adhesion and capillary forces, forces due to surface and liquid structure (e.g. solvation and hydration forces), polymer, steric and hydrophobic interactions, bio-specific interactions as well as friction and lubrication forces. Here we describe recent developments in the SFA technique, specifically the SFA 2000, its simplicity of operation and its extension into new areas of measurement of both static and dynamic forces as well as both normal and lateral (shear and friction) forces. The main reason for the greater simplicity of the SFA 2000 is that it operates on one central simple-cantilever spring to generate both coarse and fine motions over a total range of seven orders of magnitude (from millimeters to ångstroms). In addition, the SFA 2000 is more spacious and modulated so that new attachments and extra parts can easily be fitted for performing more extended types of experiments (e.g. extended strain friction experiments and higher rate dynamic experiments) as well as traditionally non-SFA type experiments (e.g. scanning probe microscopy and atomic force microscopy) and for studying different types of systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0034-4885/73/3/036601

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1016/0095-8522(52)90080-9 · doi:10.1016/0095-8522(52)90080-9
  2. Israelachvili J N, 1989, Chemtracts: Anal. Phys. Chem., 1, 1
  3. 10.1007/BF01411240 · doi:10.1007/bf01411240
  4. 10.1021/la062613g · doi:10.1021/la062613g
  5. 10.1021/nl072553e · doi:10.1021/nl072553e
  6. 10.1021/jp802535j · doi:10.1021/jp802535j
  7. 10.1021/ma047733e · doi:10.1021/ma047733e
  8. 10.1021/la051470f · doi:10.1021/la051470f
  9. 10.1021/la702126k · doi:10.1021/la702126k
  10. 10.1021/jp063161j · doi:10.1021/jp063161j
  11. 10.1021/jp0448200 · doi:10.1021/jp0448200
  12. 10.1021/jp050783g · doi:10.1021/jp050783g
  13. 10.1063/1.2184310 · doi:10.1063/1.2184310
  14. 10.1021/la702380h · doi:10.1021/la702380h
  15. 10.1351/pac198860101473 · doi:10.1351/pac198860101473
  16. 10.1063/1.1570947 · doi:10.1063/1.1570947

Cited by

See all 578

Metadata

Authors
Israelachvili, J., Min, Y., Akbulut, M., Alig, A., Carver, G., Greene, W., Kristiansen, K., Meyer, E., Pesika, N., Rosenberg, K., & Zeng, H.
Venue
Reports on Progress in Physics
Published
2010-01-27
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
036601
ISSN
  • 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6633
OpenAlex
W1979027952
Cited by
578
References
31
FWCI
14.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in the surface forces apparatus (SFA) technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0034-4885/73/3/036601
The paper
Israelachvili, J., Min, Y., Akbulut, M., Alig, A., Carver, G., Greene, W., Kristiansen, K., Meyer, E., Pesika, N., Rosenberg, K., & Zeng, H. (2010). Recent advances in the surface forces apparatus (SFA) technique. Reports on Progress in Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/73/3/036601

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.