Cited by 1,608Aeolian processes and effectsAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena

The physics of wind-blown sand and dust

Open access
Kok, Jasper F, Parteli, Eric J R, Michaels, Timothy I, Karam, Diana Bou·2012·Reports on Progress in Physics

Abstract

The transport of sand and dust by wind is a potent erosional force, creates sand dunes and ripples, and loads the atmosphere with suspended dust aerosols. This paper presents an extensive review of the physics of wind-blown sand and dust on Earth and Mars. Specifically, we review the physics of aeolian saltation, the formation and development of sand dunes and ripples, the physics of dust aerosol emission, the weather phenomena that trigger dust storms, and the lifting of dust by dust devils and other small-scale vortices. We also discuss the physics of wind-blown sand and dune formation on Venus and Titan.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 724 · Cited by 1,608

Authors
Kok, J. F., Parteli, E. J. R., Michaels, T. I., & Karam, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • Southwest Research Institute (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Reports on Progress in Physics
Published
2012-09-14
Volume
75
Issue
10
Pages
106901
ISSN
  • 0034-4885 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6633
OpenAlex
W1985657867
Cited by
1,608
References
724
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 94 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 155 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 80
FWCI
12.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reports on Progress in Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Aeolian processes and effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Keywords
wind-blown sand, aeolian dust, aeolian saltation, sand dunes, sand ripples, dust aerosols, dust storms, dust devils, small-scale vortices, Venus, Titan, Mars, wind erosion
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Dust, Models, Chemical, Silicon Dioxide, Wind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review