Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE MAGELLANIC MOPRA ASSESSMENT (MAGMA). I. THE MOLECULAR CLOUD POPULATION OF THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD

Open access
Wong, Tony, Hughes, Annie, Ott, Jürgen, Muller, Erik, Pineda, Jorge L., Bernard, Jean-Philippe, Chu, You-Hua, Fukui, Yasuo, Gruendl, Robert A., Henkel, Christian, Kawamura, Akiko, Klein, Ulrich, Looney, Leslie W., Maddison, Sarah, Mizuno, Yoji, Paradis, Deborah, Seale, Jonathan·2011·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We present the properties of an extensive sample of molecular clouds in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) mapped at 11 pc resolution in the CO(1–0) line. Targets were chosen based on a limiting CO flux and peak brightness as measured by the NANTEN survey. The observations were conducted with the ATNF Mopra Telescope as part of the Magellanic Mopra Assessment. We identify clouds as regions of connected CO emission and find that the distributions of cloud sizes, fluxes, and masses are sensitive to the choice of decomposition parameters. In all cases, however, the luminosity function of CO clouds is steeper than dN / dL ∝ L −2 , suggesting that a substantial fraction of mass is in low-mass clouds. A correlation between size and linewidth, while apparent for the largest emission structures, breaks down when those structures are decomposed into smaller structures. We argue that the correlation between virial mass and CO luminosity is the result of comparing two covariant quantities, with the correlation appearing tighter on larger scales where a size–linewidth relation holds. The virial parameter (the ratio of a cloud's kinetic to self-gravitational energy) shows a wide range of values and exhibits no clear trends with the CO luminosity or the likelihood of hosting young stellar object (YSO) candidates, casting further doubt on the assumption of virialization for molecular clouds in the LMC. Higher CO luminosity increases the likelihood of a cloud harboring a YSO candidate, and more luminous YSOs are more likely to be coincident with detectable CO emission, confirming the close link between giant molecular clouds and massive star formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/16

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Wong, T., Hughes, A., Ott, J., Muller, E., Pineda, J. L., Bernard, J.-P., Chu, Y.-H., Fukui, Y., Gruendl, R. A., Henkel, C., Kawamura, A., Klein, U., Looney, L. W., Maddison, S., Mizuno, Y., Paradis, D., & Seale, J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2011-11-07
Volume
197
Issue
2
Pages
16
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W2027407474
Cited by
266
References
0
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE MAGELLANIC MOPRA ASSESSMENT (MAGMA). I. THE MOLECULAR CLOUD POPULATION OF THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/16
The paper
Wong, T., Hughes, A., Ott, J., Muller, E., Pineda, J. L., Bernard, J.-P., Chu, Y.-H., Fukui, Y., Gruendl, R. A., Henkel, C., Kawamura, A., Klein, U., Looney, L. W., Maddison, S., Mizuno, Y., Paradis, D., & Seale, J. (2011). THE MAGELLANIC MOPRA ASSESSMENT (MAGMA). I. THE MOLECULAR CLOUD POPULATION OF THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.