THE PANCHROMATIC HUBBLE ANDROMEDA TREASURY
Open accessAbstract
The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury is an ongoing Hubble Space Telescope Multi-Cycle Treasury program to image ∼1/3 of M31's star-forming disk in six filters, spanning from the ultraviolet (UV) to the near-infrared (NIR). We use the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) and Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) to resolve the galaxy into millions of individual stars with projected radii from 0 to 20 kpc. The full survey will cover a contiguous 0.5 deg 2 area in 828 orbits. Imaging is being obtained in the F275W and F336W filters on the WFC3/UVIS camera, F475W and F814W on ACS/WFC, and F110W and F160W on WFC3/IR. The resulting wavelength coverage gives excellent constraints on stellar temperature, bolometric luminosity, and extinction for most spectral types. The data produce photometry with a signal-to-noise ratio of 4 at m F275W = 25.1, m F336W = 24.9, m F475W = 27.9, m F814W = 27.1, m F110W = 25.5, and m F160W = 24.6 for single pointings in the uncrowded outer disk; in the inner disk, however, the optical and NIR data are crowding limited, and the deepest reliable magnitudes are up to 5 mag brighter. Observations are carried out in two orbits per pointing, split between WFC3/UVIS and WFC3/IR cameras in primary mode, with ACS/WFC run in parallel. All pointings are dithered to produce Nyquist-sampled images in F475W, F814W, and F160W. We describe the observing strategy, photometry, astrometry, and data products available for the survey, along with extensive testing of photometric stability, crowding errors, spatially dependent photometric biases, and telescope pointing control. We also report on initial fits to the structure of M31's disk, derived from the density of red giant branch stars, in a way that is independent of assumed mass-to-light ratios and is robust to variations in dust extinction. These fits also show that the 10 kpc ring is not just a region of enhanced recent star formation, but is instead a dynamical structure containing a significant overdensity of stars with ages >1 Gyr.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A standard way to characterize photometric uncertainties, completeness, and bias due to crowding, is to use artificial star tests (ASTs) inserted throughout the survey area.
“A standard way to characterize photometric uncertainties, completeness, and bias due to crowding, is to use artificial star tests (ASTs) inserted throughout the survey area (Dolphin 2002; Dalcanton et al. 2012; Williams et al. 2021; Chen et al. 2025).”
From The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Southern Treasury (PHAST). II. The Spatially Resolved Recent Star Formation History in M31 (2026) · cites this paper as Dalcanton et al. 2012
PHAST builds upon the strategy of the PHAT and PHATTER surveys, providing contiguous four-band coverage in the F275W, F336W, F475W, and F814W filters using single-orbit observations from ACS/WFC and WFC3/UVIS.
“PHAST builds upon the strategy of the PHAT (Dalcanton et al. 2012) and PHATTER (Williams et al. 2021) surveys, providing contiguous four-band coverage in the F275W, F336W, F475W, and F814W filters using single-orbit observations from ACS/WFC and WFC3/UVIS.”
From The Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Southern Treasury (PHAST). II. The Spatially Resolved Recent Star Formation History in M31 (2026) · cites this paper as Dalcanton et al. 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 121 · Cited by 375
- Authors
- Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., Lang, D., Lauer, T. R., Kalirai, J. S., Seth, A. C., Dolphin, A., Rosenfield, P., Weisz, D. R., Bell, E. F., Bianchi, L. C., Boyer, M. L., Caldwell, N., Dong, H., Dorman, C. E., Gilbert, K. M., Girardi, L., Gogarten, S. M., Gordon, K. D., Guhathakurta, P., Hodge, P. W., Holtzman, J. A., Johnson, L. C., Larsen, S. S., Lewis, A., Melbourne, J. L., Olsen, K. A. G., Rix, H.-W., Rosema, K., Saha, A., Sarajedini, A., Skillman, E. D., & Stanek, K. Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- RTX (United States) (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
- Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (IT)
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- ORCID
- Dalcanton, Julianne J.
- Williams, Benjamin F.
- Lang, Dustin
- Lauer, Tod R.
- Kalirai, Jason S.
- Seth, Anil C.
- Dolphin, Andrew
- Rosenfield, Philip
- Weisz, Daniel R.
- Bell, Eric F.
- Bianchi, Luciana C.
- Boyer, Martha L.
- Caldwell, Nelson
- Dong, Hui
- Gilbert, Karoline M.
- Girardi, Léo
- Gogarten, Stephanie M.
- Gordon, Karl D.
- Guhathakurta, Puragra
- Holtzman, Jon A.
- Johnson, L. Clifton
- Larsen, Søren S.
- Lewis, Alexia
- Olsen, Knut A. G.
- Rix, Hans-Walter
- Saha, Abhijit
- Sarajedini, Ata
- Skillman, Evan D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2012-05-31
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 18
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2000070292
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 15.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Space Telescope Science Institute (GO-12055)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Keywords
- M31, star-forming disks, multi-wavelength imaging, stellar photometry, photometric calibration, photometric stability, astrometry, red giant branch stars, disk structure, interstellar extinction, stellar populations, WFC3, Advanced Camera for Surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review