THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY REVERBERATION MAPPING PROJECT: TECHNICAL OVERVIEW
Open accessAbstract
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping (SDSS-RM) project is a dedicated multi-object RM experiment that has spectroscopically monitored a sample of 849 broad-line quasars in a single 7 deg 2 field with the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey spectrograph. The RM quasar sample is flux-limited to i psf = 21.7 mag, and covers a redshift range of 0.1 < z < 4.5 without any other cuts on quasar properties. Optical spectroscopy was performed during 2014 January–July dark/gray time, with an average cadence of ∼4 days, totaling more than 30 epochs. Supporting photometric monitoring in the g and i bands was conducted at multiple facilities including the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) and the Steward Observatory Bok telescope in 2014, with a cadence of ∼2 days and covering all lunar phases. The RM field (R.A., decl. = 14:14:49.00, +53:05:00.0) lies within the CFHT-LS W3 field, and coincides with the Pan-STARRS 1 (PS1) Medium Deep Field MD07, with three prior years of multi-band PS1 light curves. The SDSS-RM six month baseline program aims to detect time lags between the quasar continuum and broad line region (BLR) variability on timescales of up to several months (in the observed frame) for ∼10% of the sample, and to anchor the time baseline for continued monitoring in the future to detect lags on longer timescales and at higher redshift. SDSS-RM is the first major program to systematically explore the potential of RM for broad-line quasars at z > 0.3, and will investigate the prospects of RM with all major broad lines covered in optical spectroscopy. SDSS-RM will provide guidance on future multi-object RM campaigns on larger scales, and is aiming to deliver more than tens of BLR lag detections for a homogeneous sample of quasars. We describe the motivation, design, and implementation of this program, and outline the science impact expected from the resulting data for RM and general quasar science.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LSST's superb AGN continuum light curves will enable economical piggyback reverberation-mapping using emission-line spectroscopy.
“The superb continuum light curves of AGNs will enable economical ' piggyback ' reverberation-mapping efforts using spectroscopy of emission lines”
From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Shen et al. 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 114 · Cited by 210
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Tonry, J., & Onaka, P. 2009, in Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveil- lance Technologies Conference, ed. S. Ryan (Kihei, HI: Maui Economic Development Board), E40
- Zu, Y., Kochanek, C. S., Kozlowski, S., & Peterson, B. M. 2014, ApJ (arXiv:1310.6774) · arXiv
- Authors
- Shen, Y., Brandt, W. N., Dawson, K. S., Hall, P. B., McGreer, I. D., Anderson, S. F., Chen, Y., Denney, K. D., Eftekharzadeh, S., Fan, X., Gao, Y., Green, P. J., Greene, J. E., Ho, L. C., Horne, K., Jiang, L., Kelly, B. C., Kinemuchi, K., Kochanek, C. S., Pâris, I., Peters, C. M., Peterson, B. M., Petitjean, P., Ponder, K., Richards, G. T., Schneider, D. P., Seth, A., Smith, R. N., Strauss, M. A., Tao, C., Trump, J. R., Wood-Vasey, W. M., Zu, Y., Eisenstein, D. J., Pan, K., Bizyaev, D., Malanushenko, V., Malanushenko, E., & Oravetz, D.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- York University (CA)
- University of Arizona (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Trieste Astronomical Observatory (IT)
- Drexel University (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- ORCID
- Shen, Yue
- Brandt, W. N.
- Dawson, Kyle S.
- Hall, Patrick B.
- McGreer, Ian D.
- Anderson, Scott F.
- Chen, Yuguang
- Eftekharzadeh, Sarah
- Fan, Xiaohui
- Gao, Yang
- Green, Paul J.
- Greene, Jenny E.
- Ho, Luis C.
- Horne, Keith
- Jiang, Linhua
- Kinemuchi, Karen
- Kochanek, Christopher S.
- Pâris, Isabelle
- Peters, Christina M.
- Peterson, Bradley M.
- Petitjean, Patrick
- Ponder, Kara
- Richards, Gordon T.
- Schneider, Donald P.
- Seth, Anil
- Smith, Robyn N.
- Strauss, Michael A.
- Tao, Charling
- Trump, Jonathan R.
- Zu, Ying
- Eisenstein, Daniel J.
- Pan, Kaike
- Bizyaev, Dmitry
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-12-23
- Volume
- 216
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2156818166
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 13
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1008882, 1108604, 11473002, 1302093, NAS 5-26555)
- U.S. Department of Energy (NAS 5-26555)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS 526555, 526555)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Yale University
- Vanderbilt University
- Princeton University (NAS 5-26555)
- Ohio State University
- Harvard University
- University of Washington (NAS 5-26555)
- Johns Hopkins University (NAS 5-26555)
- University of Arizona
- Carnegie Mellon University
- University of Portsmouth (NAS 5-26555)
- New Mexico State University (NAS 5-26555)
- Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 5-26555, 26555)
- York University
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11473002, 2014A)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Office of Science
- College of Engineering, Michigan State University
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/J001651/1)
- National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Brookhaven National Laboratory
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Keywords
- reverberation mapping, broad-line quasars, broad-line region, continuum variability, time delay, quasar accretion, multi-object spectroscopy, BOSS
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review