Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 13Relativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 13 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

General relativity in (1 + 1) dimensions

Open access
Boozer, A D·2008·European Journal of Physics

Abstract

We describe a theory of gravity in (1 + 1) dimensions that can be thought of as a toy model of general relativity. The theory should be a useful pedagogical tool, because it is mathematically much simpler than general relativity but shares much of the same conceptual structure; in particular, it gives a simple illustration of how gravity arises from spacetime curvature. We derive the theory from fundamental physical principles using two different methods, one based on extrapolating from Newtonian gravity and one based on the equivalence principle, and present several exact solutions.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper constructs a (1+1)-dimensional scalar-tensor toy model of gravity that mimics general relativity while being mathematically simpler. It derives the field equation \(R=4G g^{\alpha\beta}T_{\alpha\beta}\) from Newtonian gravity and the equivalence principle, then presents exact solutions for a stationary point particle and a static uniform-density source.

Key findings

  • In (1+1) dimensions the Einstein tensor vanishes identically, \(G_{\mu\nu}=R_{\mu\nu}-\frac{R}{2}g_{\mu\nu}=0\), so the standard Einstein field equations reduce to \(G_{\mu\nu}=8\pi G T_{\mu\nu}=0\) and do not constrain the metric; the paper instead uses \(R=4G g^{\alpha\beta}T_{\alpha\beta}\).
  • Deriving from Newtonian gravity gives \(R=4G\rho\) in the nonrelativistic limit and leads to \(R=4G g^{\alpha\beta}T_{\alpha\beta}\); deriving from the equivalence principle gives coupling \(f(\phi)=e^\phi-1\) and metric \(g_{\mu\nu}=e^{2\phi}\eta_{\mu\nu}\), with particle motion as geodesics.
  • For a stationary point particle, the solution is \(\phi(x)=Gm e^{\phi_0}|x|+\phi_0\), with curvature scalar \(R=2e^{-2\phi}\partial_x^2\phi=4Gm e^{-\phi_0}\delta(x)\), so spacetime is flat except on the particle worldline; \(\phi_0\) can be set to zero, giving \(\phi(x)=a|x|\) with \(a\equiv Gm\).
  • For a static uniform-density perfect fluid, hydrostatic equilibrium is \(\partial_x p=-(\rho+p)\partial_x\phi\) and the field equation is \(\partial_x^2\phi=2G(\rho-p)e^{2\phi}\); the dimensionless pressure is \(P(u)=\frac12(\alpha^2+1-(\alpha^2-1)\cosh u)\), the surface is at \(r=\log\frac{\alpha+1}{\alpha-1}\), and the exterior potential is \(\phi(u)=|u|-r+\phi_0+\log(1+1/\alpha)\), reducing to Newtonian gravity for \(\alpha\gg1\).

Methods

  • Theoretical/pedagogical construction in (1+1) dimensions, deriving the toy model by two routes: extrapolating from Newtonian gravity and constructing a relativistic scalar field theory that satisfies the equivalence principle.
  • Uses action formalism and energy-momentum tensor variation; solves the field equations for a stationary point particle and for a static, uniform-density perfect fluid source.
  • Includes coordinate transformations to Minkowski patches glued along the particle worldline and an explicit test-particle trajectory example with \(\theta=1/2\).

Limitations

  • The paper states no explicit limitations section; it describes the theory as a toy model and pedagogical tool that is mathematically simpler than general relativity but shares much of its conceptual structure.
  • Evident from the text: the model is only (1+1)-dimensional, where the standard Einstein field equations are trivial, so it is not a realistic theory of gravity.
  • Evident from the text: the exact solutions assume simplified settings such as static or stationary sources, a point particle or uniform-density perfect fluid, negligible test-particle mass, and specific simplifications such as static potentials, \(E=0\), and symmetry about \(u=0\).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0143-0807/29/2/013

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 3 Not valid · 7 Not checked · 56 Own results and interpretations

42 more claims

Create a free account to see all 66 claims and to verify the 11 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 11
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Misner C W, 1971, Gravitation

Cited by

See all 13

Metadata

Authors
Boozer, A. D.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Boozer, A D
Venue
European Journal of Physics
Published
2008-02-08
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
319-333
ISSN
  • 0143-0807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6404
OpenAlex
W1971959460
Cited by
13
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Physics (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
three-dimensional gravity, general relativity, spacetime curvature, equivalence principle, Newtonian gravity, exact solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.