Cited by 24Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

New loop representations for 21 gravity

Open access
Ashtekar, Abhay, Loll, R·1994·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

Since the gauge group underlying (2+1)-dimensional general relativity is non-compact, certain difficulties arise in the passage from the connection to the loop representations. It is shown that these problems can be handled by appropriately choosing the measure that features in the definition of the loop transform. Thus, `old-fashioned' loop representations---based on ordinary loops---do exist. In the case when the spatial topology is that of a 2-torus, these can be constructed explicitly; all quantum states can be represented as functions of (homotopy classes of) loops and the scalar product and the action of the basic observables can be given directly in terms of loops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/11/10/004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A second possibility is to change the integration measure in the loop transform to make various integrals converge better.

    “A second possibility is to change the integration measure in the loop transform to make various integrals converge better [30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [3][3] Ashtekar, A. Lectures on Non-Perturbative Canonical Gravity , World Scientific, Singapore, 1991 -
  2. [4][4] Ashtekar, A., Marolf, D. and Mour˜ ao, J.: Integration on the space of connections modulo gauge transformations, in: Proceedings of the Lanczos centenary conference , ed. D. Brown et al., SIAM -
  3. [6][6] Ashtekar, A., Husain, V., Rovelli, C., Samuel, J., and Smolin, L.: 2+1 gravity as a toy model for the 3+1 theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 6 (1989) L185-193; Smolin, L.: Loop representation for quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions, in: Knots, topology and quantum field theory , Proceedings of the 12th Johns Hopkins Workshop; Ashtekar, A.: Lessons from 2+1 dimensional quantum gravity, in: Strings 90 , ed. R. Arnowitt et al., World Scientific, Singapore -
  4. [9][9] Louko, J. and Marolf, D.M.: The solution space of 2+1-gravity on I R × T 2 in Witten's connection formulation, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 311-330; Carlip, S.: Six ways to quantize (2+1)-dimensional gravity, to appear in Proc. of the Fifth Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics , Waterloo, Ontario, May 1993 -
  5. [10][10] Moncrief, V.: Reduction of the Einstein equations in 2+1 dimensions to a Hamiltonian system over Teichm¨ uller space, J. Math. Phys. 30 (1989) 2907-2914; Mess, G.: Lorentz spacetimes of constant curvature, preprint Institut des Hautes ´ Etudes Scientifiques IHES/M/90/28 -
  6. [14][14] Abikoff, W.: The real analytic theory of Teichm¨ uller space, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol.820, Springer, Berlin, 1980 -
  7. [16][16] Gradsteyn, I.S. and Ryzhik, I.M.: Table of integrals, series, and products , corrected and enlarged edition, Academic Press, San Diego, 1980 -
  8. [17][17] Moncrief, V.: Recent advances in ADM reduction, in: Directions in General Relativity , vol.1, ed. B.L. Hu et al., Cambridge University Press, 1993, 231-243 -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashtekar, A., & Loll, R.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1994-10-01
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
2417-2434
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2047303640
Cited by
24
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
loop representation, quantum states, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review