Cited by 11Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

A phase space path integral for (2+1)-dimensional gravity

Open access
Carlip, S·1995·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

The relationship between the phase space path integral in (2+1)-dimensional gravity and the canonical quantization of the corresponding reduced phase space in the York time slicing is investigated. The equivalence of these two approaches is demonstrated, and some subtleties in the definition of the path integral necessary to prove this equivalence are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/12/9/007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The phase space path integral for spatially closed universes and for geometries with point particles is equivalent to canonical quantization of Section 3.1.

    “This is indeed true, as shown in [77, 245] for spatially closed universes and [63] for geometries with point particles.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1][1] For recent reviews, see S. Carlip, 'Lectures on (2+1)-Dimensional Gravity,' Davis preprint UCD-95-6, gr-qc/9503024, and R. Loll, 'Quantum Aspects of 2+1 Gravity,' INFN (Florence) preprint DFF-223-03-95, gr-qc/9503051. - · arXiv
  2. [11][11] M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992). -
  3. [20][20] W. Abikoff, The Real Analytic Theory of Teichm¨ uller Space , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 820 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980). -
  4. [21][21] H. M. Farkas and I. Kra, Riemann Surfaces (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980). -
  5. [30][30] K. Kuchaˇ r, in Proc. of the 4th Canadian Conf. on General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics , edited by G. Kunstatter et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992). -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlip, S.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Carlip, S
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1995-09-01
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
2201-2207
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2037728818
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
phase space path integral, three-dimensional gravity, canonical quantization, reduced phase space

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review