Constant mean curvature solutions of the Einstein constraint equations on closed manifolds
Abstract
We prove in detail a theorem which completes the evaluation and parametrization of the space of constant mean curvature (CMC) solutions of the Einstein constraint equations on a closed manifold. This theorem determines which sets of CMC conformal data allow the constraint equations to be solved, and which sets of such data do not. The tools we describe and use here to prove these results have also been found to be useful for the study of non-constant mean curvature solutions of the Einstein constraints.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Dirichlet energy of the identity harmonic map is a proper function on Teichmüller space.
“Note that the conformal and diffeomorphism invariance of E [ id ; g, ρ ] allow it to be a function on the Teichmüller space of Σ p and in particular a proper function (i.e., the inverse images of the compact sets are compact)[19, 35].”
From Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
There exists a harmonic map homotopic to the identity, and such a map is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism.
“From [34, 35], we know that there is a harmonic map homotopic to the identity i.e., E ∈ D 0 and in fact such a map is an orientation preserving diffeomorphism.”
From Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Big-bang limit of 2 + 1 gravity and Thurston boundary of Teichmüller space
Mondal, P. (2023) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0136631 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Isenberg, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Isenberg, James
- ORCID
- Isenberg, James
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2249-2274
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W1994815733
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
- Keywords
- Einstein constraint equations, constant mean curvature, closed manifolds, parametrization of solutions, general relativity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review