Cited by 23Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

(2 + 1) covariant lattice theory and 't Hooft's formulation

Open access
Waelbroeck, Henri, Zapata, José A·1996·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We show that 't Hooft's representation of (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity in terms of flat polygonal tiles is closely related to a gauge-fixed version of the covariant Hamiltonian lattice theory. 't Hooft's gauge is remarkable in that it leads to a Hamiltonian which is a linear sum of vertex Hamiltonians, each of which is defined modulo . A cyclic Hamiltonian implies that `time' is quantized. However, it turns out that this Hamiltonian is constrained . If one chooses an internal time and solves this constraint for the `physical Hamiltonian', the result is not a cyclic function. Even if one quantizes following Dirac, the `internal time' observable does not acquire a discrete spectrum. We also show that in Euclidean three-dimensional lattice gravity, `space' can be either discrete or continuous depending on the choice of quantization. Finally, we propose a generalization of 't Hooft's gauge for Hamiltonian lattice formulations of topological gravity dimension four.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/13/7/009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Criscuolo A, Quevedo H and Waelbroeck H 1995 Quantization of 2 + 1 gravity on the torus Proc. Canadian Association for Physics Meeting (Quebec 1995) to be published

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waelbroeck, H., & Zapata, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1996-07-01
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
1761-1768
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2032941728
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9423950, 9396246)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
three-dimensional gravity, lattice gravity, time quantization, internal time, Dirac quantization, discrete space, topological gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review