Cited by 16Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Quantizing Regge calculus

Open access
Immirzi, Giorgio·1996·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

A discretized version of canonical gravity in (3 + 1) dimensions introduced in a previous paper is further developed, introducing the Liouville form and the Poisson brackets, and studying them in detail in an explicit parametrization that shows the nature of the variables when the second class constraints are imposed. It is then shown that, even leaving aside the difficult question of imposing the first class constraints on the states, it is impossible to quantize the model directly using complex variables and leaving the second class constraints to fix the metric of the quantum Hilbert, because one cannot find a metric which makes the area variables Hermitean.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/13/9/006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our expression for the proper time propagator U(T) of GR as a sum over worldsheets resembles in many ways the worldsheet sum for the projector on physical states, U_OCY, of the OCY model.

    “More specifically, our expression for the proper time propagator U ( T ) of GR as a sum over worldsheets resembles in many ways the worldsheet sum [8,56] 14 for the projector on physical states, U OCY , of the OCY model.”

    From “Sum over surfaces” form of loop quantum gravity (1997) · cites this paper as [56]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 16

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ashtekar 1991 A Non-perturbative Canonical Quantum Gravity notes prepared in collaboration with R Tate (Singapore: World Scientific)
  2. Ashtekar A and Loll R Preprint gr-qc/9405031 · arXiv
  3. Frölich J 1983 Preprint IHES (1992 reprinted in Non-perturbative Quantum Field Theory (Singapore: World Scientific))

Authors
Immirzi, G.
Affiliations
University of Perugia (IT)
Corresponding author
Immirzi, Giorgio
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1996-09-01
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
2385-2393
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2031743224
Cited by
16
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Regge calculus, canonical gravity, Poisson brackets, second-class constraints, first-class constraints, quantum Hilbert space, area operator, Hermiticity, 3+1 dimensional gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review