Cited by 5Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Hyperbolic geometry in 't Hooft's approach to (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity

Open access
Hollmann, Helia R, Williams, Ruth M·1999·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

In 't Hooft's polygon model of (2 + 1)-dimensional gravity coupled to point particles, the initial data are constrained by the vertex equations and the particle equations. We show that the constraint equations correspond to a hyperbolic geometry. In particular, we derive that the hyperbolic group of motions is the discrete analogue of the diffeomorphisms in the continuum theory. The hyperbolic model can be extended to point particles, but they spoil the gauge invariance. Using this insight we calculate consistent sets of initial data for the model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/16/5/304

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first discrete formulation designed explicitly for 2+1 dimensions was developed by 't Hooft et al.

    “The first discrete formulation designed explicitly for 2 + 1 dimensions was developed by’ t Hooft et al. [250, 252, 253, 124, 274, 156].”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [156]

    The Introduction says ’t Hooft introduced a polygon approach to (2+1)-dimensional gravity, and Section 2 describes its tessellation into polygonal tiles. This supports the attribution of a discrete formulation to ’t Hooft, but the paper does not establish that it was the first such formulation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hollmann, H. R., & Williams, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
1503-1518
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W1988364498
Cited by
5
References
0
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
three-dimensional gravity, hyperbolic geometry, constraint equations, point particles, gauge invariance, initial data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review