Cited by 275Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A Lorentzian signature model for quantum general relativity

Open access
Barrett, John W, Crane, Louis·2000·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

We give a relativistic spin network model for quantum gravity based on the Lorentz group and its q-deformation, the Quantum Lorentz Algebra. We propose a combinatorial model for the path integral given by an integral over suitable representations of this algebra. This generalises the state sum models for the case of the four-dimensional rotation group previously studied in gr-qc/9709028. As a technical tool, formulae for the evaluation of relativistic spin networks for the Lorentz group are developed, with some simple examples which show that the evaluation is finite in interesting cases. We conjecture that the `10J' symbol needed in our model has a finite value.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/17/16/302

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Barrett-Crane models are obtained as the γ → ∞ limit of the previous constructions.

    “The Barrett-Crane models [60, 59] can easily be obtained in the present framework as a suitable limiting case γ → ∞ of the previous constructions.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [60]

  • There are two exceptional possibilities: γ = ±i, where the constraint could in principle be imposed strongly but the self-dual sector is absent, and the sector corresponding to the Barrett-Crane model.

    “The first one is to take γ = ±i, in which case the constraint (186) could, in principle, be imposed strongly. However, the self-dual sector is not present in .The second possibility is to work in the sector where . Where, as in the Riemannian case, it corresponds to the Barret-Crane model [60] with the various limitations discussed in Section 10.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [60]

  • The Turaev-Viro partition function was proved to give, in the asymptotic limit, 3D Euclidean gravity with a cosmological constant, and can be thought of as a quantization of BF theory, which is classically equivalent to 3D gravity and also equivalent to two copies of Chern-Simons theory.

    “This partition function was then proved [51,52] to give, in the asymptotic limit, 3D Euclidean gravity with cosmological constant, and can be thought of as giving a quantization of BF theory [53,54], a topological field theory, classically equivalent to 3D gravity”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 275

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Baez J, 2000, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.
  2. Podles P, 1990, Commun. Math. Phys., 136, 399
  3. Gel'fand I M, 1947, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 11, 411
  4. Naimark M A, 1964, Am. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 36, 101
  5. Gel'fand I M, 1959, Tr. Mosk. Mat. O.-va, 88, 321

Metadata

Authors
Barrett, J. W., & Crane, L.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2000-08-02
Volume
17
Issue
16
Pages
3101-3118
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2031282132
Cited by
275
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
quantum general relativity, Lorentzian signature, discrete general relativity, quantum gravity, Euclidean signature, discrete spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review