Cited by 83Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Loop quantum cosmology: III. Wheeler-DeWitt operators

Open access
Bojowald, Martin·2001·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

Within the framework of loop quantum cosmology anomaly-free quantizations of the Hamiltonian constraint for Bianchi class A, locally rotationally symmetric and isotropic models are given. Basic ideas of the construction in (non-symmetric) loop quantum gravity can be used, but there are also further inputs because the special structure of symmetric models has to be respected by operators. In particular, the basic building blocks of the homogeneous models are point holonomies rather than holonomies necessitating a new regularization procedure. In this respect, our construction is also applicable for other (non-homogeneous) symmetric models, e.g. the spherically symmetric one.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/18/6/307

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evolution equation is not a differential equation in time, but a difference equation manifesting the discreteness of time.

    “This implies another difference, namely that the evolution equation is not a differential equation in time, but a difference equation manifesting the discreteness of time [13].”

    From Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology (2001) · cites this paper as [13]

  • Discrete geometry implies that eigenvalues of p are discrete, whence time evolution is now discrete.

    “Furthermore, discrete geometry imples that eigenvalues of p are discrerte, whence time evolution is now discrete (see [13] for details).”

    From Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology (2001) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [7][7] T. Thiemann, Closed Formula for the Matrix Elements of the Volume Operator in Canonical Quantum Gravity, J. Math. Phys. 39 (1998) 3347-3371, [gr-qc/9606091] - · arXiv
  2. [9][9] T. Thiemann, Gauge Field Theory Coherent States (GCS): I. General Properties, hep-th/0005233 - · arXiv
  3. [10][10] T. Thiemann, Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD), Class. Quantum Grav. 15 (1998) 839-873, [gr-qc/9606089] - · arXiv
  4. [11][11] C. Di Bartolo, R. Gambini, J. Griego, and J. Pullin, Consistent Canonical Quantization of General Relativity in the Space of Vassiliev Knot Invariants, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2314-2317, [gr-qc/9909063] - · arXiv
  5. [12][12] T. Thiemann, Quantum Spin Dynamics (QSD): III. Quantum Constraint Algebra and Physical Scalar Product in Quantum General Relativity, Class. Quantum Grav. 15 (1998) 1207-1247, [gr-qc/9705017] - · arXiv
  6. [15][15] M. Bojowald, Loop Quantum Cosmology: I. Kinematics, Class. Quantum Grav. 17 (2000) 1489-1508, [gr-qc/9910103] - · arXiv
  7. [17][17] M. Bojowald, Quantum Geometry and Symmetry , PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen, 2000 -
  8. [18][18] M. Bojowald, Loop Quantum Cosmology IV: Discrete Time Evolution, gr-qc/0008053 - · arXiv
  9. [20][20] M. Bojowald, Loop Quantum Cosmology: II. Volume Operators, Class. Quantum Grav. 17 (2000) 1509-1526, [gr-qc/9910104] - · arXiv
  10. [21][21] J. F. Barbero G., Real Ashtekar Variables for Lorentzian Signature Space-Times, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 5507-5510, [gr-qc/9410014] - · arXiv
  11. [25][25] J. Lewandowski and D. Marolf, Loop Constraints: A Habitat and their Algebra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 7 (1998) 299-330, [gr-qc/9710016] - · arXiv
  12. [27][27] R. Borissov, R. De Pietri, and C. Rovelli, Matrix Elements of Thiemann's Hamiltonian Constraint in Loop Quantum Gravity, Class. Quantum Grav. 14 (1997) 2793-2823, [gr-qc/9703090] · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bojowald, M.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2001-02-27
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1055-1069
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W1988029030
Cited by
83
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
loop quantum cosmology, Wheeler-DeWitt equation, Hamiltonian constraint, isotropic model, spherically symmetric models, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review