Cited by 15Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Three-dimensional Einstein gravity and Regge calculus

Open access
Rocek, M, Williams, R M·1985·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

The authors discuss the connection between Regge calculus and Einstein gravity in three spacetime dimensions. It is shown how the Regge calculus Bianchi identities imply momentum conservation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/2/5/012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Classical Regge calculus in 2+1 dimensions was investigated by Rocek and Williams, who showed that it gave exact results for point particle scattering.

    “Classical Regge calculus in 2 + 1 dimensions was investigated by Rocek and Williams [235], who showed that it gave exact results for point particle scattering.”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [235]

    The discussion on p. 703 uses Regge calculus in (2+1) dimensions to derive results for gravitating point particles, including a collision in which two particles coalesce. It does not establish exact results for point-particle scattering generally; that wording is broader than the collision result shown. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. RoEek M and Williams R M 1982 Quantum Structure of Space and Time ed M J Duff and C J Isham (Cambridge: CUP) pp 105-16

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rocek, M., & Williams, R. M.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1985-09-01
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
701-706
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2004017761
Cited by
15
References
1
Citations by year
2015: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
Funders
Aspen Center for Physics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Regge calculus, three-dimensional Einstein gravity, Bianchi identities, momentum conservation, lattice gravity, discrete spacetime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review