Cited by 28Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Peaks in the Hartle–Hawking wavefunction from sums over topologies

Open access
Anderson, M, Carlip, S, Ratcliffe, J G, Surya, S, Tschantz, S T·2004·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

Recent developments in ‘Einstein Dehn filling’ allow the construction of infinitely many Einstein manifolds that have different topologies but are geometrically close to each other. Using these results, we show that for many spatial topologies, the Hartle–Hawking wavefunction for a spacetime with a negative cosmological constant develops sharp peaks at certain calculable geometries. The peaks we find are all centred on spatial metrics of constant negative curvature, suggesting a new mechanism for obtaining local homogeneity in quantum cosmology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/21/2/025

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1][1] S. W. Hawking, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, S. W. Hawking and W. Israel, editors (Cambridge University Press, 1979).
  2. [14][14] M. T. Anderson, math.dg/0303260. · arXiv
  3. [17][17] P. Petersen, Riemannian Geometry (Springer, 1998).
  4. [19][19] M. Burger, T. Gelander, A. Lubotzky, and S. Mozes, Geom. Funct. Anal. 12 (2002) 1161. 14 http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0303260 · arXiv
  5. [21][21] See, for example, the articles by D. J. Gross, V. Kazakov, and M. R. Douglas in Strings 90 , edited by R. Arnowitt et al. (World Scientific, 1991).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, M., Carlip, S., Ratcliffe, J. G., Surya, S., & Tschantz, S. T.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Raman Research Institute (IN)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2003-12-23
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
729-741
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2076853091
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0305865)
  • U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
negative cosmological constant, Einstein manifolds, constant negative curvature, local homogeneity, quantum cosmology, spatial topology, Euclidean quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review