The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations
Open accessAbstract
The Laser Interferometric Space Antenna (LISA) will observe supermassive black hole binary mergers with an amplitude signal-to-noise ratio of several thousand. We investigate the extent to which such observations afford high-precision tests of Einstein's gravity. We show that LISA provides a unique opportunity to probe the nonlinear structure of post-Newtonian theory both in the context of general relativity and its alternatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics
Will, C. M. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781316338612 · Cited by 3,637
Physics, Astrophysics and Cosmology with Gravitational Waves
Sathyaprakash, B. S., & Schutz, B. F. (2009) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2009-2 · Cited by 874
Self-citationGravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries
Blanchet, L. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-4 · Cited by 686
Metadata
- Authors
- Arun, K. G., Iyer, B. R., Qusailah, M. S. S., & Sathyaprakash, B. S.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-03-31
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- L37-L43
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W2111125400
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/l01
- The paper
- Arun, K. G., Iyer, B. R., Qusailah, M. S. S., & Sathyaprakash, B. S. (2006). Testing post-Newtonian theory with gravitational wave observations. Classical and Quantum Gravity. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/l01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
