Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strengths of naked singularities in Tolman-Bondi spacetimes

Open access
Newman, R P A C·1986·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

Christodoulou's recent analysis (1984) of naked singularities in time-symmetric Tolman-Bondi collapse is simplified and generalised to a wider class of Tolman-Bondi models. The strengths of the naked singularities are assessed in terms of limiting focusing conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/3/4/007

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Newman, R. P. A. C.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
1986-07-01
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
527-539
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2086139158
Cited by
269
References
0
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strengths of naked singularities in Tolman-Bondi spacetimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0264-9381/3/4/007
The paper
Newman, R. P. A. C. (1986). Strengths of naked singularities in Tolman-Bondi spacetimes. Classical and Quantum Gravity. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/3/4/007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.