Cited by 23Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryAdvanced Differential Geometry Research

The energy and momentum of the Universe

Open access
Popławski, Nikodem J·2014·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

The Einstein$-$Cartan$-$Sciama$-$Kibble theory of gravity naturally extends general relativity to include quantum-mechanical, intrinsic angular momentum of matter by equipping spacetime with torsion. Using the Einstein energy$-$momentum pseudotensor for the gravitational field in this theory, we show that the energy and momentum of the closed Universe are equal to zero. Since the positive energy from mass and motion of the observed matter in the Universe exceeds in magnitude the negative energy from gravity, the Universe must contain another form of matter whose energy is negative. This form, which cannot be composed from particles, might be the observed dark matter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/31/6/065005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum effects in the presence of an extremely strong gravitational field cause an intense particle production, which creates an enormous amount of mass without changing the total energy (matter plus gravitational field) in the black hole.

    “Quantum effects in the presence of an extremely strong gravitational field cause an intense particle production, which creates an enormous amount of mass (Parker 1968(Parker , 1969;;Zel'dovich 1970;Parker 1971aParker , 1971b;;Zel'dovich & Starobinskii 1977) without changing the total energy (matter plus gravitational field) in the black hole (Popławski 2014).”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Popławski 2014

  • This scenario could also explain the arrow of time and the black hole information paradox.

    “This scenario could also explain the arrow of time and the black hole information paradox (Popławski 2010c(Popławski , 2011a(Popławski , 2014)).”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Popławski 2014

  • Particle production does not change the total energy and momentum of the matter and gravitational field in the universe.

    “Particle production does not change the total energy and momentum of the matter and gravitational field in the universe (Popławski 2014).”

    From UNIVERSE IN A BLACK HOLE IN EINSTEIN–CARTAN GRAVITY (2016) · cites this paper as Popławski 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]N. Popglyph[suppress] lawski, arXiv:1304.0047 (2013). · arXiv
  2. [2]T. W. B. Kibble, J. Math. Phys. 2 , 212 (1961); D. W. Sciama, Recent Developments in General Relativity , p. 415 (Pergamon, 1962); Rev. Mod. Phys. 36 , 463 (1964); Rev. Mod. Phys. 36 , 1103 (1964); F. W. Hehl and B. K. Datta, J. Math. Phys. 12 , 1334 (1971); F. W. Hehl, Phys. Lett. A 36 , 225 (1971); Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 4 , 333 (1973); Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 5 , 491 (1974); F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick, and J. M. Nester, Rev. Mod. Phys. 48 , 393 (1976); V. de Sabbata and M. Gasperini, Introduction to Gravitation (World Scientific, 1985); V. de Sabbata and C. Sivaram, Spin and Torsion in Gravitation (World Scientific, 1994).
  3. [3]E. A. Lord, Tensors, Relativity and Cosmology (McGraw-Hill, 1976).
  4. [7]N. J. Popglyph[suppress] lawski, arXiv:0911.0334 (2009). · arXiv
  5. [9]E. Schr¨ odinger, Space-time Structure (Cambridge University Press, 1954).
  6. [15]L. S. Sparke and J. S. Gallagher, Galaxies in the Universe (Cambridge University Press, 2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popławski, N. J.
Corresponding author
Popławski, Nikodem J
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2014-02-24
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
065005
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W1804386439
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Keywords
Einstein-Cartan theory, torsion, negative energy, dark matter, quantum gravity, cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review