The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Einstein-Maxwell null fields of Petrov type D
Abstract
A proof is given that the Robinson-Trautman family exhausts the full set of Petrov type-D Einstein-Maxwell null solutions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When Λ > 0 (Λ < 0) this solution represents the (anti-)Nariai universe [8] with pure radiation which can not be an electromagnetic field (see the general theorem in [25]).”
From Explicit Kundt type II and N solutions as gravitational waves in various type D and O universes (2003) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“However, these electromagnetic waves are now necessarily accompanied by a gravitational wave component (see section 3 and [25]).”
From Explicit Kundt type II and N solutions as gravitational waves in various type D and O universes (2003) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Explicit Kundt type II and N solutions as gravitational waves in various type D and O universes
Podolsk, J., & Ortaggio, M. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/9/307 · Cited by 61
Algebraically special Einstein–Maxwell fields
Van den Bergh, N. (2017) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-016-2171-x · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergh, N. V. D.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1989-12-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1871-1878
- ISSN
- 0264-9381
- 1361-6382
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
