Quantum reference systems
Abstract
The author argues that only by taking into account the quantum properties of the bodies that form the reference frames, physical quantum operators can be defined in quantum gravity. The theory of general relativity coupled to matter introduced in a companion paper is considered. Its formal canonical quantization yields two surprising results: the diffeomorphism constraint can be exactly solved; and the Hamiltonian constraint reduces, in the context of a well defined approximation, to a Schrodinger evolution equation. By using the solutions of the quantum constraints of vacuum general relativity recently obtained in the loop representation, and in the context of a 'realistic' local material reference system, he defines a quantum gravitational theory in which the constraints can be solved, the only remaining equation is a regularized Schrodinger equation which expresses the dynamics in the internal clocks, and a class of gauge-invariant physical observables is explicitly displayed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Every planar non intersecting n-tangle with n inputs and n outputs is equivalent to the product of elementary tangles 1^n, U1, ..., Un-1.
“In [59] it is shown that every planar non intersecting n -tangle with n inputs and n outputs is equivalent to the product of elementary tangles 1 1 n , U 1 , . . . , U n -1 , given by”
From Geometry eigenvalues and the scalar product from recoupling theory in loop quantum gravity (1996) · cites this paper as [59]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 250
- Authors
- Rovelli, C.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1991-02-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 317-331
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W2004859216
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- quantum reference frames, quantum gravity, diffeomorphism constraint, Hamiltonian constraint, loop representation, Schrödinger equation, internal clock, gauge-invariant observables, quantum operators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review