The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proximity algorithms for image models: denoising
Open accessAbstract
This paper introduces a novel framework for the study of the total-variation model for image denoising. In the model, the denoised image is the proximity operator of the total-variation evaluated at a given noisy image. The total-variation can be viewed as the composition of a convex function (the ℓ 1 norm for the anisotropic total-variation or the ℓ 2 norm for the isotropic total-variation) with a linear transformation (the first-order difference operator). These two facts lead us to investigate the proximity operator of the composition of a convex function with a linear transformation. Under the assumption that the proximity operator of a given convex function (e.g., the ℓ 1 norm or the ℓ 2 norm) can be readily obtained, we propose a fixed-point algorithm for computing the proximity operator of the composition of the convex function with a linear transformation. We then specialize this fixed-point methodology to the total-variation denoising models. The resulting algorithms are compared with the Goldstein–Osher split-Bregman denoising algorithm. An important advantage of the fixed-point framework leads us to a convenient analysis for convergence of the proposed algorithms as well as a platform for us to develop efficient numerical algorithms via various fixed-point iterations. Our numerical experience indicates that the methods proposed here perform favorably.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Donoho, D. L. (2004) · Cited by 16,703
A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing
(1999) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-466606-1.x5000-4 · Cited by 16,227
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Bertsekas, D. P. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600425 · Cited by 11,726
Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage
Donoho, D. L., & Johnstone, I. M. (1994) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/81.3.425 · Cited by 8,760
The Split Bregman Method for L1-Regularized Problems
Goldstein, T., & Osher, S. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080725891 · Cited by 4,282
chambolle (2004) · doi:10.1023/b:jmiv.0000011321.19549.88 · Cited by 3,227
Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting
Combettes, P. L., & Wajs, V. R. (2005) · Multiscale Modeling & Simulation · doi:10.1137/050626090 · Cited by 2,678
Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions
Nesterov, Y. (2005) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0552-5 · Cited by 2,455
Metadata
- Authors
- Micchelli, C. A., Shen, L., & Xu, Y.
- Venue
- Inverse Problems
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2011-03-17
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 045009
- ISSN
- 0266-5611 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6420
- OpenAlex
- W1971478618
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proximity algorithms for image models: denoising. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0266-5611/27/4/045009
- The paper
- Micchelli, C. A., Shen, L., & Xu, Y. (2011). Proximity algorithms for image models: denoising. Inverse Problems. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/27/4/045009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.