Scalar production in schwarzschild and rindler metrics
Open accessAbstract
The procedure used recently by Hawking (1975) to demonstrate the creation of massless particles by black holes is applied to the Rindler coordinate system in flat space-time. The result is that an observer who undergoes a uniform acceleration kappa apparently sees a fixed surface radiate with a temperature of kappa /2 pi . Some implications of this result are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to the Fulling-Davies-Unruh effect, accelerated observers in a vacuum observe a thermal radiation bath of real particles in the flat spacetime around them, with the particles originating from the quantum-field-theory vacuum itself.
“According to the Fulling-Davies-Unruh effect (Fulling, 1973; Davies, 1975; Unruh, 1976), accelerated observers in a vacuum observe a thermal radiation bath of real particles in the flat spacetime around them, with the particles originating from the quantumfield-theory vacuum itself.”
From A strictly local solution to the problem of energy in general relativity (2026) · cites this paper as Davies, 1975
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Notes on black-hole evaporation
Unruh, W. G. (1976) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.870 · Cited by 4,850 · see citing works
Observable Zitterbewegung in curved spacetimes
Kobakhidze, A., Manning, A., & Tureanu, A. (2016) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.049 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A strictly local solution to the problem of energy in general relativity
Vieira, W. M., & Magalhaes, N. S. (2026) · Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences · doi:10.3389/fspas.2025.1710235
“According to the Fulling–Davies–Unruh effect (Fulling, 1973; Davies, 1975; Unruh, 1976), accelerated observers in a vacuum observe a thermal radiation bath of real particles in the flat spacetime around them, with the particles originating from the quantum-field-theory vacuum itself.”
- Authors
- Davies, P. C. W.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Davies, P C W
- ORCID
- Davies, P C W
- Venue
- Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1975-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 609-616
- ISSN
- 0305-4470 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6447
- OpenAlex
- W2009816832
- Cited by
- 1,005
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- Hawking radiation, Rindler metric, Schwarzschild metric, particle creation, accelerated observers, black hole radiation, massless scalar field, flat spacetime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review