Analytic theory of the ground state properties of a spin glass. I. Ising spin glass
Open accessAbstract
A general theory to count the number of local minimum states in an Ising spin glass is developed. The problem is reduced to finding the partition function of an interacting non-random spin system with an imaginary spin weight function. For the infinite-ranged spin glass with Gaussian bond distribution, the authors find (g 0 )=2 0.28743N for the average number of the local minimum states. The distribution function for the energies of these states is also studied. The upper limit of the average ground state energy per spin of the infinite-ranged spin glass is found to be -J/ square root 2 pi .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number of energy minima (spurious states, stable states) of Hopfield networks is exponentially in d.
“In contrast to the storage capacity, the number of energy minima (spurious states, stable states) of Hopfield networks is exponentially in d (Tanaka & Edwards, 1980; Bruck & Roychowdhury, 1990; Wainrib & Touboul, 2013).”
From Hopfield Networks is All You Need (2020) · cites this paper as Tanaka & Edwards, 1980
Section 4, “Infinite-ranged spin glass,” gives an exponential-in-N count of local minimum states for an Ising spin glass, where N is the number of spins. It does not establish that count for Hopfield networks specifically, so the claim extends the result beyond the model studied. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hopfield Networks is All You Need
Ramsauer, H., Schäfl, B., Lehner, J., Seidl, P., Widrich, M., Adler, T., Gruber, L., Holzleitner, M., Pavlović, M., Sandve, G. K., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02217 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tanaka, F., & Edwards, S. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 1980-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2769-2778
- ISSN
- 0305-4608 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059775469
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Physics F Metal Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Dynamics and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › advanced mathematical theories
- Keywords
- Ising spin glass, ground-state properties, partition function, energy distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review