Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Empirical description of the role of electronegativity in alloy formation

Miedema, A R, Boer, F R de, Chatel, P F de·1973·Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics

Abstract

Empirical correlations are established, which demonstrate that the heat of formation of metallic binary alloy systems is predominantly determined by the electronegativity difference, the difference in electronic density at the boundary of the atomic cell and the size difference, the third term being absent for compounds. The work function of a metal is recommended as a measure for its electronegativity. The electron density at the cell boundary is shown to be related to the compressibility of the pure metal. The consequences of the energy effects for quantitative descriptions of charge transfer in metallic alloys are discussed extensively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0305-4608/3/8/012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Miedema, A. R., Boer, F. R. D., & Chatel, P. F. D.
Venue
Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics
Published
1973-08
Volume
3
Issue
8
Pages
1558-1576
ISSN
0305-4608 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131577694
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
31.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical description of the role of electronegativity in alloy formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0305-4608/3/8/012
The paper
Miedema, A. R., Boer, F. R. D., & Chatel, P. F. D. (1973). Empirical description of the role of electronegativity in alloy formation. Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4608/3/8/012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.