Physics constrained nonlinear regression models for time series
Open accessAbstract
A central issue in contemporary science is the development of data driven statistical nonlinear dynamical models for time series of partial observations of nature or a complex physical model. It has been established recently that ad hoc quadratic multi-level regression (MLR) models can have finite-time blow up of statistical solutions and/or pathological behaviour of their invariant measure. Here a new class of physics constrained multi-level quadratic regression models are introduced, analysed and applied to build reduced stochastic models from data of nonlinear systems. These models have the advantages of incorporating memory effects in time as well as the nonlinear noise from energy conserving nonlinear interactions. The mathematical guidelines for the performance and behaviour of these physics constrained MLR models as well as filtering algorithms for their implementation are developed here. Data driven applications of these new multi-level nonlinear regression models are developed for test models involving a nonlinear oscillator with memory effects and the difficult test case of the truncated Burgers–Hopf model. These new physics constrained quadratic MLR models are proposed here as process models for Bayesian estimation through Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms of low frequency behaviour in complex physical data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It has been shown both theoretically and in practice that theory-agnostic models generalize poorly to unseen data despite being highly accurate on observed data.
“Finally, within predictive models, it has been shown both theoretically 35 and in practice 36 that theory-agnostic models generalize poorly to unseen data despite being highly accurate on observed data.”
From A Big Data Guide to Understanding Climate Change: The Case for Theory-Guided Data Science (2014) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 146
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Tong H 1990 Nonlinear Time Series: A Dynamical Systems Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
- Kunita H 1978 Supports of diffusion processes and controllability problems Proc. Int. Symp. Stochastic Differential Equations (Kyoto University, Japan) pp 163-85 (New York: Wiley)
- Authors
- Majda, A. J., & Harlim, J.
- Affiliations
- Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Venue
- Nonlinearity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-11-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-217
- ISSN
- 0951-7715 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6544
- OpenAlex
- W2021972235
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nonlinearity (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0456713)
- North Carolina State University
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (N00014-12-1-0912)
- Office of Naval Research (MURI N00014-12-1-0912, N00014-11-1-0310, N00014-11-1-0306, N00014-12-1-0912, N00014-12-1, N00014-12, N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
- Keywords
- nonlinear dynamical systems, time series, memory effects, nonlinear noise, invariant measures, finite-time blow-up, nonlinear oscillators, Bayesian estimation, Markov chain Monte Carlo, filtering algorithms, data-driven modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review