Confounding of the association between radiation exposure from CT scans and risk of leukemia and brain tumors by cancer susceptibility syndromes
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies linking radiation exposure from pediatric computed tomography (CT) to increased risks of leukemia and brain tumors lacked data to control for cancer susceptibility syndromes (CSS). These syndromes might be confounders because they are associated with an increased cancer risk and may increase the likelihood of pediatric CT scans. We identify CSS predisposing to leukemia and brain tumors through a systematic literature search and summarize prevalence and risk. Since empirical evidence is lacking in published literature on patterns of CT use for most types of CSS, we estimate confounding bias of relative risks (RR) for categories of radiation exposure based on expert opinion about patterns of CT scans among CSS patients. We estimate that radiation-related RRs for leukemia are not meaningfully confounded by Down syndrome, Noonan syndrome and other CSS. Moreover, tuberous sclerosis complex, von Hippel–Lindau disease, neurofibromatosis type 1 and other CSS do not meaningfully confound RRs for brain tumors. Empirical data on the use of CT scans among CSS patients is urgently needed. Our assessment indicates that associations with radiation exposure from pediatric CT scans and leukemia or brain tumors reported in previous studies are unlikely to be substantially confounded by unmeasured CSS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 157 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Meulepas, J. M., Ronckers, C. M., Merks, J., Weijerman, M. E., Lubin, J. H., & Hauptmann, M.
- Affiliations
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hauptmann, Michael
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Radiological Protection
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-11-28
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 953-974
- ISSN
- 0952-4746 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6498
- OpenAlex
- W2558439039
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 157
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.amsterdamumc.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Radiological Protection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Worldwide Cancer Research (12-1155)
- European Commission (FP7/2007-2013)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Keywords
- pediatric computed tomography, ionizing radiation exposure, leukemia risk, brain tumor risk, cancer predisposition syndromes, confounding, Down syndrome, Noonan syndrome, tuberous sclerosis complex, von Hippel-Lindau disease, neurofibromatosis type 1, relative risk estimation
- MeSH terms
- Radiation Exposure, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Diagnostic Imaging, Female, Humans, Leukemia, Life Expectancy, Male, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Comorbidity, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Prevalence, Risk Assessment, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review