Cited by 111Superconducting and THz Device TechnologyPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 160 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase dynamics in a stack of inductively coupled intrinsic Josephson junctions and terahertz electromagnetic radiation

Open access
Hu, Xiao, Lin, Shi-Zeng·2010·Superconductor Science and Technology

Abstract

The Josephson effect is a phenomenon of current flow across two weakly linked superconductors separated by a thin barrier, i.e. a Josephson junction, associated with coherent quantum tunneling of Cooper pairs. Many novel phenomena appear due to the nonlinear property of the Josephson effect, such as Shapiro steps in dc current–voltage ( IV ) characteristics of a Josephson junction under microwave irradiation, which can be used as a voltage standard. The Josephson effect also provides a unique way to generate high-frequency electromagnetic (EM) radiation by dc bias voltage as the inverse process of the Shapiro step. The discovery of cuprate high- T c superconductors accelerated the effort to develop novel sources of EM waves based on a stack of atomically densely packed intrinsic Josephson junctions (IJJs), since the large superconductivity gap covers the whole terahertz (THz) frequency band. Very recently, strong and coherent THz radiation has been successfully generated from a mesa structure of a Bi 2 Sr 2 CaCu 2 O 8 + δ single crystal which works both as the source of energy gain and as the cavity for resonance. This experimental breakthrough posed a challenge to the theoretical study of the phase dynamics of stacked IJJs, since the phenomenon cannot be explained by the known solutions of the sine-Gordon equation so far. It is then found theoretically that, due to the huge inductive coupling of IJJs produced by the nanometer junction separation and the large London penetration depth of the order of micrometers of the material, a novel dynamic state is stabilized in the coupled sine-Gordon system, in which ± π kinks are developed in the superconductivity phase difference responding to the standing wave of the Josephson plasma and are stacked alternately in the c axis. This novel solution of the inductively coupled sine-Gordon equations captures the important features of experimental observations. The theory predicts an optimal radiation power larger than the one observed in recent experiments by orders of magnitude, and thus suggests the technological relevance of the phenomena.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0953-2048/23/5/053001

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 159 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Kulik I O, 1967, Sov. Phys.-Tech. Phys., 12, 111
  2. Kulik I O, 1967, Sov. Phys.-JETP, 24, 1307
  3. Scott A C, 1967, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 12, 308
  4. Yanson I K, 1965, Sov. Phys.-JETP, 21, 650
  5. Abrikosov A A, 1957, Sov. Phys.-JETP, 5, 1174
  6. Giamarchi T, 2002, High Magnetic Fields, Applications in Condensed Matter Physics, Spectroscopy
  7. Lawrence W E Doniach S Kanda E, 1971, Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Low Temp. Phys., 361
  8. Lin S Z, 2010, J. Supercond. Novel Magn.
  9. Stutzman W L, 1998, Antenna Theory and Design
  10. Kadowaki K, 2009, 9th Int. Conf. on Materials and Mechanisms of Superconductivity
  11. Lin S Z, 2010, Physica

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hu, X., & Lin, S.-Z.
Affiliations
National Institute for Materials Science (JP)
Venue
Superconductor Science and Technology
Published
2010-04-19
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
053001
ISSN
  • 0953-2048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6668
OpenAlex
W1975877596
Cited by
111
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Superconductor Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Superconducting and THz Device Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Keywords
intrinsic Josephson junctions, terahertz radiation, phase dynamics, inductive coupling, sine-Gordon equation, kinks, Josephson plasma, Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, cuprate superconductors, terahertz sources, London penetration depth, radiated power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review