Cited by 353Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesStrong Light-Matter InteractionsQuantum many-body systems

The truncated Wigner method for Bose-condensed gases: limits of validity and applications

Open access
Sinatra, Alice, Lobo, Carlos, Castin, Yvan·2002·Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics

Abstract

We study the truncated Wigner method applied to a weakly interacting spinless Bose-condensed gas which is perturbed away from thermal equilibrium by a time-dependent external potential. The principle of the method is to generate an ensemble of classical fields ψ( r ) which samples the Wigner quasi-distribution function of the initial thermal equilibrium density operator of the gas, and then to evolve each classical field with the Gross–Pitaevskii equation. In the first part of the paper we improve the sampling technique over our previous work (Sinatra et al 2000 J. Mod. Opt. 47 2629–44) and we test its accuracy against the exactly solvable model of the ideal Bose gas. In the second part of the paper we investigate the conditions of validity of the truncated Wigner method. For short evolution times it is known that the time-dependent Bogoliubov approximation is valid for almost pure condensates. The requirement that the truncated Wigner method reproduces the Bogoliubov prediction leads to the constraint that the number of field modes in the Wigner simulation must be smaller than the number of particles in the gas. For longer evolution times the nonlinear dynamics of the noncondensed modes of the field plays an important role. To demonstrate this we analyse the case of a three-dimensional spatially homogeneous Bose-condensed gas and we test the ability of the truncated Wigner method to correctly reproduce the Beliaev–Landau damping of an excitation of the condensate. We have identified the mechanism which limits the validity of the truncated Wigner method: the initial ensemble of classical fields, driven by the time-dependent Gross–Pitaevskii equation, thermalizes to a classical field distribution at a temperature T class which is larger than the initial temperature T of the quantum gas. When T class significantly exceeds T a spurious damping is observed in the Wigner simulation. This leads to the second validity condition for the truncated Wigner method, T class − T ≪ T , which requires that the maximum energy max of the Bogoliubov modes in the simulation does not exceed a few k B T .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0953-4075/35/17/301

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The driven-dissipative condition makes the truncated Wigner approach much more stable than in the conservative case, because field fluctuations reach a driven-dissipative steady state determined by stochastic noise and dissipation before approaching an inaccurate classical field thermal equilibrium state.

    “Interestingly, the driven-dissipative condition makes the truncated Wigner approach much more stable than in the conservative case, as the field fluctuations get to a driven-dissipative steady-state determined by the interplay of stochastic noise and dissipation well before approaching an inaccurate classical field thermal equilibrium state [84].”

    From How to exploit driving and dissipation to stabilize and manipulate quantum many-body states (2025) · cites this paper as [84]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 353

Authors
Sinatra, A., Lobo, C., & Castin, Y.
Affiliations
Laboratoire Kastler Brossel (FR)
Venue
Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
Published
2002-08-21
Volume
35
Issue
17
Pages
3599-3631
ISSN
0953-4075 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044922368
Cited by
353
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Strong Light-Matter Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
Bose-Einstein condensate, Gross-Pitaevskii equation, Bogoliubov approximation, ideal Bose gas, validity conditions, weakly interacting Bose gas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review