Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction to attosecond delays in photoionization

Open access
Dahlström, J M, L’Huillier, A, Maquet, A·2012·Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics

Abstract

This tutorial presents an introduction to the interaction of light and matter on the attosecond timescale.Our aim is to detail the theoretical description of ultra-short time delays and to relate these to the phase of extreme ultraviolet (XUV) light pulses and to the asymptotic phaseshifts of photoelectron wave packets.Special emphasis is laid on time-delay experiments, where attosecond XUV pulses are used to photoionize target atoms at well-defined times, followed by a probing process in real time by a phase-locked, infrared laser field.In this way, the laser field serves as a 'clock' to monitor the ionization event, but the observable delays do not correspond directly to the delay associated with single-photon ionization.Instead, a significant part of the observed delay originates from a measurement induced process, which obscures the single-photon ionization dynamics.This artefact is traced back to a phaseshift of the above-threshold ionization transition matrix element, which we call the continuum-continuum phase.It arises due to the laser-stimulated transitions between Coulomb continuum states.As we shall show here, these measurement-induced effects can be separated from the single-photon ionization process, using analytical expressions of universal character, so that eventually the attosecond time delays in photoionization can be accessed.(Some figures may appear in colour only in the online journal) List of abbreviations APT Attosecond pulse train ATI Above-threshold ionization CEP Carrier envelope phase FROG Frequency-resolved optical gating CRAB Complete reconstruction of attosecond bursts GD Group delay HHG High-order harmonic generation IR Infrared MBPT Many-body perturbation theory RABITT Resolution of attosecond beating by interference of two-photon transitions RPA Random-phase approximation SAE Single-active electron SAP Single-attosecond pulse SB Sideband SFA Strong-field approximation SPA Saddle-point approximation TDSE Time-dependent Schrödinger equation TOF Time-of-flight VMI Velocity-map imaging WKB Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin XUV Extreme ultraviolet

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0953-4075/45/18/183001

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 114 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Dahlström, J. M., L’Huillier, A., & Maquet, A.
Venue
Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
Published
2012-08-30
Volume
45
Issue
18
Pages
183001
ISSN
  • 0953-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6455
OpenAlex
W2166524322
Cited by
365
References
114
FWCI
20.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Introduction to attosecond delays in photoionization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0953-4075/45/18/183001
The paper
Dahlström, J. M., L’Huillier, A., & Maquet, A. (2012). Introduction to attosecond delays in photoionization. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/45/18/183001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.