Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 770

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Polar oxide surfaces

Noguera, Claudine·2000·Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter

Abstract

In the light of recent experimental as well as theoretical studies, we summarize our present understanding of polar oxide surfaces and examine fundamental issues regarding their stability. The focus is on the surface atomic configurations (relaxations, reconstructions, non-stoichiometry, etc) obtained under specific preparation conditions and their associated electronic structure. We discuss several mechanisms at work on polar surfaces, such as relaxation effects, change of covalency in the surface layers, partial filling of surface states, and stoichiometry variations, and try to assess their actual efficiency for cancelling the polarity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0953-8984/12/31/201

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 770

Metadata

Authors
Noguera, C.
Venue
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Published
2000-07-18
Volume
12
Issue
31
Pages
R367-R410
ISSN
  • 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-648X
OpenAlex
W2036926759
Cited by
770
References
0
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polar oxide surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0953-8984/12/31/201
The paper
Noguera, C. (2000). Polar oxide surfaces. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/12/31/201

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.