The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atomistic simulations of complex materials: ground-state and excited-state properties
Open accessAbstract
The present status of development of the density-functional-based tight-binding (DFTB) method is reviewed. As a two-centre approach to density-functional theory (DFT), it combines computational efficiency with reliability and transferability. Utilizing a minimal-basis representation of Kohn-Sham eigenstates and a superposition of optimized neutral-atom potentials and related charge densities for constructing the effective many-atom potential, all integrals are calculated within DFT. Self-consistency is included at the level of Mulliken charges rather than by self-consistently iterating electronic spin densities and effective potentials. Excited-state properties are accessible within the linear response approach to time-dependent (TD) DFT. The coupling of electronic and ionic degrees of freedom further allows us to follow the non-adiabatic structure evolution via coupled electron-ion molecular dynamics in energetic particle collisions and in the presence of ultrashort intense laser pulses. We either briefly outline or give references describing examples of applications to ground-state and excited-state properties. Addressing the scaling problems in size and time generally and for biomolecular systems in particular, we describe the implementation of the parallel `divide-and-conquer' order- N method with DFTB and the coupling of the DFTB approach as a quantum method with molecular mechanics force fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems
Runge, E., & Gross, E. K. U. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.997 · Cited by 8,914
Cited by
DFTB3: Extension of the Self-Consistent-Charge Density-Functional Tight-Binding Method (SCC-DFTB)
Gaus, M., Cui, Q., & Elstner, M. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100684s · Cited by 1,118
Self-citationBrunk, E., & Rothlisberger, U. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500628b · Cited by 494
Exploring local currents in molecular junctions
Solomon, G. C., Herrmann, C., Hansen, T., Mujica, V., & Ratner, M. A. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.546 · Cited by 448
A novel hybrid carbon material
Nasibulin, A. G., Pikhitsa, P. V., Jiang, H., Brown, D. P., Krasheninnikov, A. V., Anisimov, A. S., Queipo, P., Moisala, A., Gonzalez, D., Lientschnig, G., et al. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.37 · Cited by 417
Understanding plasma catalysis through modelling and simulation—a review
Neyts, E. C., & Bogaerts, A. (2014) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/47/22/224010 · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Frauenheim, T., Seifert, G., Elstner, M., Niehaus, T., Köhler, C., Amkreutz, M., Sternberg, M., Hajnal, Z., Carlo, A. D., & Suhai, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-03-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3015-3047
- ISSN
- 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-648X
- OpenAlex
- W2089799707
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atomistic simulations of complex materials: ground-state and excited-state properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/313
- The paper
- Frauenheim, T., Seifert, G., Elstner, M., Niehaus, T., Köhler, C., Amkreutz, M., Sternberg, M., Hajnal, Z., Carlo, A. D., & Suhai, S. (2002). Atomistic simulations of complex materials: ground-state and excited-state properties. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/313
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.