The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The physics behind high-temperature superconducting cuprates: the plain vanilla version of RVB
Open accessAbstract
One of the first theoretical proposals for understanding high-temperature superconductivity in the cuprates was Anderson's RVB theory using a Gutzwiller projected BCS wavefunction as an approximate ground state. Recent work by Paramekanti et al has shown that this variational approach gives a semi-quantitative understanding of the doping dependences of a variety of experimental observables in the superconducting state of the cuprates. In this paper we revisit these issues using the 'renormalized mean field theory' of Zhang et al based on the Gutzwiller approximation in which the kinetic and superexchange energies are renormalized by different doping-dependent factors g t and g S respectively. We point out a number of consequences of this early mean field theory for experimental measurements which were not available when it was first explored, and observe that it is able to explain the existence of the pseudogap, properties of nodal quasiparticles and approximate spin–charge separation, the latter leading to large renormalizations of the Drude weight and superfluid density. We use the Lee–Wen theory of the phase transition as caused by thermal excitation of nodal quasiparticles, and also obtain a number of further experimental confirmations. Finally, we remark that superexchange, and not phonons, is responsible for d-wave superconductivity in the cuprates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices
Bloch, I. (2005) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys138 · Cited by 1,457
Colloquium : Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors
Fradkin, E., Kivelson, S. A., & Tranquada, J. M. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.457 · Cited by 1,070
Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer
Wecker, D., Hastings, M. B., Wiebe, N., Clark, B. K., Nayak, C., & Troyer, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062318 · Cited by 285
Competition between the pseudogap and superconductivity in the high-Tc copper oxides
Kondo, T., Khasanov, R., Takeuchi, T., Schmalian, J., & Kaminski, A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07644 · Cited by 275
Johnson, T. H., Clark, S. R., & Jaksch, D. (2014) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt10 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, P. W., Lee, P. A., Randeria, M., Rice, T. M., Trivedi, N., & Zhang, F. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-06-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- R755-R769
- ISSN
- 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-648X
- OpenAlex
- W2082389997
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The physics behind high-temperature superconducting cuprates: the plain vanilla version of RVB. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0953-8984/16/24/r02
- The paper
- Anderson, P. W., Lee, P. A., Randeria, M., Rice, T. M., Trivedi, N., & Zhang, F. C. (2004). The physics behind high-temperature superconducting cuprates: the plain vanilla version of RVB. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/16/24/r02
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.