The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative study of attractor neural network retrieving at low spike rates: I. substrate—spikes, rates and neuronal gain
Abstract
We discuss the conversion of the description of the dynamics of a neural network from a temporal variation of synaptic currents driven by point spikes and modulated by a synaptic structure to a description of the current dynamics driven by spike rates. The conditions for the validity of such a conversion are discussed in detail and are shown to be quite realistic in cortical conditions. This is done in preparation for a discussion of a scenario of an attractor neural network, based on the interaction of synaptic currents and neural spike rates.The spike rates are then expressed in terms of the currents themselves to provide a closed set of dynamical equations for the currents. The current-rate relation is expressed as a neuronal gain function, converting currents into spike rates. It describes an integrate-and-fire element with noisy inputs, under explicit quaniitatve conditions which we argue to be plausible in a cortical situation In particular, it is shown that the gain of the current to rate transduction function, deduced from realistic parameters, does not exclude the possibility of a stable operation of the prospectrve ANN at low spike rates The actual integration into an associative memory network is left for the consecutive article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
Cited by
The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550 · Cited by 2,152
A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input
Burkitt, A. N. (2006) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0068-6 · Cited by 1,208
A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions
Wong, K.-F., & Wang, X.-J. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3733-05.2006 · Cited by 1,029
Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model
Samsonovich, A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05900.1997 · Cited by 989
Synaptic basis of cortical persistent activity: the importance of NMDA receptors to working memory
Wang, X.-J. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-21-09587.1999 · Cited by 859
Metadata
- Authors
- Amit, D. J., & Tsodyks, M. V.
- Venue
- Network Computation in Neural Systems
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Published
- 1991-01-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-273
- ISSN
- 0954-898X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154914851
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative study of attractor neural network retrieving at low spike rates: I. substrate—spikes, rates and neuronal gain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0954-898x/2/3/003
- The paper
- Amit, D. J., & Tsodyks, M. V. (1991). Quantitative study of attractor neural network retrieving at low spike rates: I. substrate—spikes, rates and neuronal gain. Network Computation in Neural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898x/2/3/003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.