The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative study of attractor neural networks retrieving at low spike rates: II. Low-rate retrieval in symmetric networks
Abstract
A network of current-rate dynamics with a symmetric synaptic matrix is analysed and simulated for its low-rate attractor structure. The dynamics is deterministic, with the noise included in a realistic current-rate transduction function (discussed in part I)The analysis is carried out in mean-field theory. It is shown that at low loading the network retrieves without errors, with uniform low rates, that there are no simple spurious states and that the low-rate attractors, retrieving single patterns, are stable to the admixture of additional patterns. The analysis of the attractors in a network with an extensive number of patterns is carried out in the replica symmetric approximations. The results for the dependence of the retrieval rates on loading level; for the distribution of rates among neurons, as well as for the storage capacity are compared with simulations. Simulations also show that retriewal performance is very robust to random elimination of synapses. Moreover, errors in the stimulus, relative to the stored patterns, are very rapidly corrected.It is shown that memory saturation expresses itself either in a drift toward a quiescent state, or in the freezing of rates in the two classes of neurons in a pattern in the foreground and in the background. Freezing means that in each class a subset of neurons are active at high rates and the others are quiescent. The two activity distributions become indistinguishable
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
Chaos in random neural networks
Sompolinsky, H., Crisanti, A., & Sommers, H. J. (1988) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.259 · Cited by 1,061
Cited by
A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input
Burkitt, A. N. (2006) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0068-6 · Cited by 1,208
Path integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model
Samsonovich, A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05900.1997 · Cited by 989
Synaptic basis of cortical persistent activity: the importance of NMDA receptors to working memory
Wang, X.-J. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-21-09587.1999 · Cited by 859
A history of spike-timing-dependent plasticity
Markram, H. (2011) · Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsyn.2011.00004 · Cited by 454
The Hebbian paradigm reintegrated: local reverberations as internal representations
Amit, D. J. (1995) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00040164 · Cited by 388
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Amit, D., & Tsodyks, M.
- Venue
- Network: Computation in Neural Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1991-08-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-294
- ISSN
- 0954-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6536
- OpenAlex
- W2155598451
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative study of attractor neural networks retrieving at low spike rates: II. Low-rate retrieval in symmetric networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0954-898x/2/3/004
- The paper
- Amit, D., & Tsodyks, M. (1991). Quantitative study of attractor neural networks retrieving at low spike rates: II. Low-rate retrieval in symmetric networks. Network: Computation in Neural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898x/2/3/004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.