The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local feature analysis: a general statistical theory for object representation
Abstract
Low-dimensional representations of sensory signals are key to solving many of the computational problems encountered in high-level vision. Principal component analysis (PCA) has been used in the past to derive practically useful compact representations for different classes of objects. One major objection to the applicability of PCA is that it invariably leads to global, non-topographic representations that are not amenable to further processing and are not biologically plausible. In this paper we present a new mathematical construction, local feature analysis (LFA), for deriving local topographic representations for any class of objects. The LFA representations are sparse-distributed and, hence, are effectively low-dimensional and retain all the advantages of the compact representations of the PCA. But, unlike the global eigenmodes, they give a description of objects in terms of statistically derived local features and their positions. We illustrate the theory by using it to extract local features for three ensembles: 2D images of faces without background, 3D surfaces of human heads, and finally 2D faces on a background. The resulting local representations have powerful applications in head segmentation and face recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 · Cited by 3,578
Competitive learning: From interactive activation to adaptive resonance
Grossberg, S. (1987) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00862.x · Cited by 1,471
On the computational architecture of the neocortex: II The role of cortico-cortical loops
Mumford, D. (1992) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00198477 · Cited by 1,074
On the computational architecture of the neocortex: I. The role of the thalamo-cortical loop
Mumford, D. (1991) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00202389 · Cited by 929
Cited by
Zhang, B., Shan, S., Chen, X., & Gao, W. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.884956 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Penev, P. S., & Atick, J. J.
- Venue
- Network Computation in Neural Systems
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 477-500
- ISSN
- 0954-898X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067807322
- Cited by
- 627
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 16.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local feature analysis: a general statistical theory for object representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0954-898x/7/3/002
- The paper
- Penev, P. S., & Atick, J. J. (1996). Local feature analysis: a general statistical theory for object representation. Network Computation in Neural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898x/7/3/002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.