The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistics of natural time-varying images
Abstract
Natural time-varying images possess substantial spatiotemporal correlations. We measure these correlations-or equivalently the power spectrum-for an ensemble of more than a thousand segments of motion pictures and we find significant regularities. More precisely, our measurements show that the dependence of the power spectrum on the spatial frequency, f, and temporal frequency, w, is in general non-separable and is given by f−m−1F(w/f), where F(w/f) is a non-trivial function of the ratio w/f. We give a theoretical derivation of this scaling behaviour and show that it emerges from objects with a static power spectrum ∼f−m, appearing at a wide range of depths and moving with a distribution of velocities relative to the observer. We show that in the regime of relatively high temporal and low spatial frequencies the power spectrum becomes independent of the details of the velocity distribution and that it is separable into the product of spatial and temporal power spectra with the temporal part given by the universal power law ∼w−2. Making some reasonable assumptions about the form of the velocity distribution we derive an analytical expression for the spatiotemporal power spectrum which is in excellent agreement with the data for the entire range of spatial and temporal frequencies of our measurements. The results in this paper have direct implications for neural processing of time-varying images in the visual pathway.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The authors of [36] found that frame-differenced natural videos reliably obey a (global) space-time spectral model.”
From Blind Prediction of Natural Video Quality (2014) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1162/neco.1990.2.3.308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1162/neco.1992.4.2.196 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/AO.26.000157 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/0954-898X_6_2_003 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1993.0038 · DOI
- 10.1364/JOSAA.4.002379 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/0954-898X_3_1_008 · DOI
- 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90163-Q · DOI
- 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1952.tb01404.x · DOI
- Press W H, 1992, Numerical Recipes: the Art of Scientific Computing
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.814 · DOI
- 10.1016/0042-6989(80)90032-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1992.tb00296.x · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Natural Image Statistics and Neural Representation
Simoncelli, E. P., & Olshausen, B. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1193 · Cited by 2,460
Expectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms
Summerfield, C., & de Lange, F. P. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3838 · Cited by 832
Blind Prediction of Natural Video Quality
Saad, M. A., Bovik, A. C., & Charrier, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2014.2299154 · Cited by 471
Dynamic predictive coding by the retina
Hosoya, T., Baccus, S. A., & Meister, M. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03689 · Cited by 468
Huang, Y., & Rao, R. P. N. (2011) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.142 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Dong, D. W., & Atick, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Computational Neuroscience Laboratory, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021-6399, USA
- Venue
- Network: Computation in Neural Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-358
- ISSN
- 0954-898X
- 1361-6536
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.