The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biocomposite nanofibres and osteoblasts for bone tissue engineering
Open accessAbstract
Nanofibres and nanocomposites are highly promising recent additions to materials in relation to tissue engineering. Mimicking the architecture of an extracellular matrix is one of the major challenges for tissue engineering. An operationally simple electrospinning technique was used to fabricate polycaprolactone/nanohydroxyapatite/collagen (PCL/nHA/Col) biocomposite nanofibrous scaffolds to provide mechanical support and to direct the growth of human fetal osteoblasts (hFOB) for tissue engineering of bone. Biocomposite nanofibres constructed with PCL, nHA and collagen type I combinations gave fibre diameters around 189 ± 0.026 to 579 ± 272 nm and pore sizes 2–35 µm. Resulting nanofibrous scaffolds were highly porous (>80%) structures and provided a sufficient open pore structure for cell occupancy whilst allowing free transport of nutrients and metabolic waste products; moreover, vascular in-growth was facilitated. The pore organization was determined by the deposition process, including interconnections of the fibre network. The mineralization was significantly increased (55%) in PCL/nHA/Col biocomposite nanofibrous scaffolds after 10 days of culture and appeared as minerals synthesized by osteoblast cells. The unique nanoscale biocomposite system had inherent surface functionalization for hFOB adhesion, migration, proliferation and mineralization to form a bone tissue for the regeneration of bone defects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hierarchically biomimetic bone scaffold materials: nano‐HA/collagen/PLA composite
Liao, S. S., Cui, F. Z., Zhang, W., & Feng, Q. L. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.20035 · Cited by 487
Significance of synthetic nanostructures in dictating cellular response
Yim, E. K. F., & Leong, K. W. (2005) · Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2004.11.008 · Cited by 281
Cited by
Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering
Wubneh, A., Tsekoura, E. K., Ayranci, C., & Uludağ, H. (2018) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.031 · Cited by 584
Electrospun materials as potential platforms for bone tissue engineering
Jang, J.-H., Castano, O., & Kim, H.-W. (2009) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.008 · Cited by 493
Putting Electrospun Nanofibers to Work for Biomedical Research
Xie, J., Li, X., & Xia, Y. (2008) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.200800381 · Cited by 381
Emerging chitin and chitosan nanofibrous materials for biomedical applications
Ding, F., Deng, H., Du, Y., Shi, X., & Wang, Q. (2014) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c4nr02814g · Cited by 342
Interaction of cells and nanofiber scaffolds in tissue engineering
Venugopal, J., Low, S., Choon, A. T., & Ramakrishna, S. (2008) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30841 · Cited by 332
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Venugopal, J., Vadgama, P., Kumar, T. S. S., & Ramakrishna, S.
- Venue
- Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-01-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 055101
- ISSN
- 0957-4484 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6528
- OpenAlex
- W2042243490
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biocomposite nanofibres and osteoblasts for bone tissue engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0957-4484/18/5/055101
- The paper
- Venugopal, J., Vadgama, P., Kumar, T. S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2007). Biocomposite nanofibres and osteoblasts for bone tissue engineering. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/5/055101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.