CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Low-cost silver capped polystyrene nanotube arrays as super-hydrophobic substrates for SERS applications

Lovera, Pierre, Creedon, Niamh, Alatawi, Hanan, Mitchell, Micki, Burke, Micheal, Quinn, Aidan J, O’Riordan, Alan·2014·Nanotechnology
DOI 10.1088/0957-4484/25/17/175502
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the fabrication, simulation and characterization of dense arrays of freestanding silver capped polystyrene nanotubes, and demonstrate their suitability for surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) applications. Substrates are fabricated in a rapid, low-cost and scalable way by melt wetting of polystyrene (PS) in an anodized alumina (AAO) template, followed by silver evaporation. Scanning electron microscopy reveals that substrates are composed of a dense array of freestanding polystyrene nanotubes topped by silver nanocaps. SERS characterization of the substrates, employing a monolayer of 4-aminothiophenol (4-ABT) as a model molecule, exhibits an enhancement factor of ∼1.6 × 10(6), in agreement with 3D finite difference time domain simulations. Contact angle measurements of the substrates revealed super-hydrophobic properties, allowing pre-concentration of target analyte into a small volume. These super-hydrophobic properties of the samples are taken advantage of for sensitive detection of the organic pollutant crystal violet, with detection down to ∼400 ppt in a 2 μl aliquot demonstrated.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0957-4484/25/17/175502

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1002/bbpc.19900940938 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0022-0728(77)80224-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1021/ja00457a071 · DOI
  4. 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.112814 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/nl101946c · DOI
  6. 10.1021/nl904170g · DOI
  7. 10.1021/am1011518 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/jrs.4163 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/ac051357u · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nbt1138 · DOI
  11. 10.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143007 · DOI
  12. 10.1039/c1an15279c · DOI
  13. 10.1021/jp302967p · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.09.105 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nnano.2011.226 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.184 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.snb.2011.03.024 · DOI
  18. 10.1039/c1nr10265f · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.nantod.2010.11.001 · DOI
  20. 10.1021/ja0578350 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/nl102838w · DOI
  22. Schmidt M S, 2012, Adv. Mater., 24, OP11
  23. 10.1364/OE.20.024819 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/nn200636t · DOI
  25. Manas R G, 2010, Nanotechnology, 21
  26. 10.1063/1.3599551 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/nn401199k · DOI
  28. 10.1021/nl201212n · DOI
  29. Kim A, 2012, Anal. Chem., 84, 9303, 10.1021/ac302025q · DOI
  30. 10.1021/ja200247x · DOI
  31. 10.1039/c3sc51231b · DOI
  32. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.222 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/adma.200701539 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/adma.200401726 · DOI
  35. 10.1364/OE.20.025325 · DOI
  36. 10.1021/jp0687908 · DOI
  37. 10.1021/jp203263e · DOI
  38. 10.1039/c2cp42598j · DOI
  39. 10.1021/jp807807j · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lovera, P., Creedon, N., Alatawi, H., Mitchell, M., Burke, M., Quinn, A. J., & O’Riordan, A.
Venue
Nanotechnology
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2014-04-09
Volume
25
Issue
17
Pages
175502
ISSN
  • 0957-4484
  • 1361-6528
DOI
10.1088/0957-4484/25/17/175502
Cited by
32
References
0
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review