Intranasal delivery of paroxetine nanoemulsion via the olfactory region for the management of depression: Formulation, behavioural and biochemical estimation
Open accessAbstract
Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and is used for the treatment of depression and anxiety problems, but suffers from the drawback of poor oral bioavailability (less than 50%) due to its extensive first pass metabolism. The objective of the present study was to develop a paroxetine loaded nanoemulsion (o/w type) for direct nose-to-brain delivery. Nanoemulsions were prepared by the spontaneous emulsification technique using Capmul MCM, Solutol HS 15 and propylene glycol as oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant, respectively, for delivery of drug directly to the brain through the nasal route for better management of depression. Formulations were studied for droplet size, polydispersity index (PDI), percentage transmittance, refractive index, viscosity, zeta potential, surface morphology and in vitro permeation study. TEM images of optimized formulation showed spherical droplets with a mean diameter of 58.47 ± 3.02 nm, PDI of 0.339 ± 0.007 and zeta potential values of -33 mV. The formulation showed good results for transmittance (100.60 ± 0.577%), refractive index (1.412 ± 0.003) and viscosity (40.85 ± 6.40 cP). Permeation studies revealed a 2.57-fold enhancement in permeation as compared to the paroxetine suspension. Behavioural studies such as the forced swimming test and locomotor activity test were done on Wistar rats to study the antidepressant effect of the optimized formulation. Treatment of depressed rats with paroxetine nanoemulsion (administered intranasally) significantly improved the behavioural activities in comparison to paroxetine suspension (orally administered). Biochemical estimation results revealed that the prepared nanoemulsion was effective in enhancing the depressed levels of glutathione and decreasing the elevated levels of TBARS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Treatment of depressed rats with nasal paroxetine nanoemulsions significantly improved their behavioral activities compared to oral paroxetine suspensions.
“The treatment of depressed rats with nasal paroxetine NEs significantly improved their behavioral activities with respect to oral paroxetine suspensions.”
From Nanoemulsions for “Nose-to-Brain” Drug Delivery (2019) · cites this paper as [69]
Section 3.5.7.2 reports better locomotor activity in depressed rats given intranasal paroxetine nanoemulsion than in those given oral suspension (219.16 versus 143.5 beam counts). Its reported p-values compare each treatment with depressed controls, not the two treatments with each other, so the claimed statistical significance of the between-treatment difference is not established by the results passage. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEx vivo studies on porcine nasal mucosa revealed that permeation of paroxetine nanoemulsions occurs with about a threefold enhancement compared to paroxetine suspensions.
“Ex vivo studies carried out on porcine nasal mucosa revealed that permeation occurs with about a threefold enhancement in comparison with paroxetine suspensions.”
From Nanoemulsions for “Nose-to-Brain” Drug Delivery (2019) · cites this paper as [69]
Brain tissues treated with paroxetine nasal nanoemulsions showed decreased degeneration and damage in the vesicular nuclei compared to the naïve group.
“Histopathological studies were carried out on the brain tissues of Wistar rats, and brain tissues treated with paroxetine nasal NEs showed decreased degeneration and damage in the vesicular nuclei in comparison to the naïve group.”
From Nanoemulsions for “Nose-to-Brain” Drug Delivery (2019) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Pandey, Y. R., Kumar, S., Gupta, B. K., Ali, J., & Baboota, S.
- Affiliations
- Hamdard University (PK)
- Corresponding author
- Baboota, Sanjula
- Venue
- Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-12-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 025102
- ISSN
- 0957-4484 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6528
- OpenAlex
- W2414998610
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- paroxetine, nanoemulsions, intranasal drug delivery, nose-to-brain delivery, depression, olfactory drug delivery, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, forced swim test, locomotor activity, glutathione, lipid peroxidation, TBARS, first-pass metabolism, antidepressant effects
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Emulsions, Female, Male, Particle Size, Swine, Rats, Wistar, Paroxetine, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review