The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The distribution of ion energies at the substrate in an asymmetric bi-polar pulsed DC magnetron discharge
Open accessAbstract
Using an energy-resolved mass spectrometer and a time-resolved Langmuir probe, the distribution of bombarding ion energies, their fluxes and energy fluxes at a substrate in an asymmetric bi-polar pulsed DC magnetron have been determined. The discharge was operated in Ar at a pressure of 0.53 Pa with a Ti target and pulsed DC frequencies of 100 and 350 kHz with a range of duty cycles (from 50 to 96%). At 100 kHz, the Ar + and Ti + time-averaged ion energy distribution functions (IEDFs) reveal three peaks, which are at low energy (<10 eV), in a mid-range (20-50 eV) and at high energy (60-100 eV). We correlate these peaks with distinct phases of the discharge voltage. At 350 kHz the IEDFs show four peaks reflecting a more complex voltage waveform. The low-energy ions are generated in the `on' phase when the plasma potential is typically a few volts above ground. The Ti + energy spectra show a remnant of the original sputter-neutral energy distribution function. The mid-range ions are produced in the quiescent region of the voltage reverse phase, when the plasma potential is raised globally a few volts above the cathode potential, typically 10-30 V. The high-energy ions are generated in a period of ~0.3 µs, during the discharge voltage overshoot, when the target potential rises to typically over +140 V. However, given the time resolution of the Langmuir probe (0.5 µs), it is not possible to determine if plasma potential is lifted globally to this high potential or only close to the cathode. At 350 kHz, these `fast' ions make up to about a quarter of the total ion flux at the substrate and an upper bound transient power flux of about 2.5 times the maximum delivered in the `on' phase. The total power flux to a substrate in the sustained phase of the discharge is found to increase with frequency and reverse time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 150
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1016/0257-8972(93)90248-M · DOI
- 10.1016/S0042-207X(98)00265-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01058-1 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.581706 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(96)02997-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00990-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01084-2 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.578286 · DOI
- Musil J, 1992, Kovine zlitine technologije, 31, 295
- 10.1016/S0042-207X(98)00414-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00604-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(96)03088-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01067-0 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.582059 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)01127-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00672-1 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.578955 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.579874 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.356292 · DOI
- 10.1116/1.578171 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.358887 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00375-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01071-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0042-207X(01)00350-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00376-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01611-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)01090-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0042-207X(99)00189-X · DOI
- Barton D, 2000, Meas. Sci. Technol., 11, 1726, 10.1088/0957-0233/11/12/312 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradley, J. W., Bäcker, H., Aranda-Gonzalvo, Y., Kelly, P. J., & Arnell, R. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Salford (GB)
- Venue
- Plasma Sources Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-04-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-174
- ISSN
- 0963-0252 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6595
- OpenAlex
- W2096277584
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Plasma Sources Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
- University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR202203)
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma Applications
- Keywords
- ion energy distribution function, ion flux, energy flux, fast ions, plasma electric potential, titanium target, argon plasma, power flux, duty cycle, ion bombardment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The distribution of ion energies at the substrate in an asymmetric bi-polar pulsed DC magnetron discharge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0963-0252/11/2/307
- The paper
- Bradley, J. W., Bäcker, H., Aranda-Gonzalvo, Y., Kelly, P. J., & Arnell, R. D. (2002). The distribution of ion energies at the substrate in an asymmetric bi-polar pulsed DC magnetron discharge. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/11/2/307