The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media
Abstract
This paper summarizes the results of a research project analyzing communication about global warming among those in the fields of science, politics, and the media in Germany between 1975 and 1995. The methodology of discourse analysis has been applied to investigate the changing perceptions of climate change over time and the ways in which it became an important issue on Germany's political agenda. The first part of the paper will briefly introduce the underlying theoretical assumptions and explain the multiple steps by which data covering a period of two decades have been collected and analyzed. In the second part, the paper will provide the reader with the main research results, indicating the usefulness of distinguishing among the separate discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. The results suggest that there are specific discourse dynamics common to each of the three spheres, as well as some important disparities among them. These findings will be illustrated by a selection of examples typical of the samples analyzed. Finally, the third part of the paper will discuss the broader theoretical and practical implications of these results, which suggest that modern societies must cope not only with environmental risks but also with the risks inherent in communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001 · Cited by 1,699
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211416646 · Cited by 1,123
Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A., & Schäfer, M. S. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020 · Cited by 753
The Rising Threat of Atmospheric CO2: A Review on the Causes, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies
Nunes, L. J. R. (2023) · Environments · doi:10.3390/environments10040066 · Cited by 587
Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change
Antilla, L. (2005) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.003 · Cited by 511
Metadata
- Authors
- Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P.
- Venue
- Public Understanding of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-283
- ISSN
- 0963-6625 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6609
- OpenAlex
- W2123392368
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
- The paper
- Weingart, P., Engels, A., & Pansegrau, P. (2000). Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.