Cited by 31Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesAeroelasticity and Vibration Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enhanced damping for bridge cables using a self-sensing MR damper

Chen, Z H, Lam, K H, Ni, Y Q·2016·Smart Materials and Structures

Abstract

This paper investigates enhanced damping for protecting bridge stay cables from excessive vibration using a newly developed self-sensing magnetorheological (MR) damper. The semi-active control strategy for effectively operating the self-sensing MR damper is formulated based on the linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) control by further considering a collocated control configuration, limited measurements and nonlinear damper dynamics. Due to its attractive feature of sensing-while-damping, the self-sensing MR damper facilitates the collocated control. On the other hand, only the sensor measurements from the self-sensing device are employed in the feedback control. The nonlinear dynamics of the self-sensing MR damper, represented by a validated Bayesian NARX network technique, are further accommodated in the control formulation to compensate for its nonlinearities. Numerical and experimental investigations are conducted on stay cables equipped with the self-sensing MR damper operated in passive and semi-active control modes. The results verify that the collocated self-sensing MR damper facilitates smart damping for inclined cables employing energy-dissipative LQG control with only force and displacement measurements at the damper. It is also demonstrated that the synthesis of nonlinear damper dynamics in the LQG control enhances damping force tracking efficiently, explores the features of the self-sensing MR damper, and achieves better control performance over the passive MR damping control and the Heaviside step function-based LQG control that ignores the damper dynamics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chen et al. exhibited a self-sensing MR damper for protection of bridge stay cables under extreme vibrations using the linear-quadratic-Gaussian control strategy and a Bayesian NARX network approach taking into consideration limited measurements, a collocated sensing-damping arrangement, and nonlinear dynamics of the self-sensing damper.

    “Chen et al. [100] exhibited a self-sensing MR damper for protection of bridge stay cables under extreme vibrations using the linear-quadratic-Gaussian control strategy and a Bayesian NARX network approach taking into consideration the limited measurements and a collocated sensing-damping arrangement as well as nonlinear dynamics of the self-sensing damper.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Achkire, 1996, Active tendon control of cable-stayed bridges, Earthq. Eng. Struct. D, 25, 585, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199606)25:6<585::AID-EQE570>3.0.CO;2-I · DOI
  2. Casas, 2010, Rain-wind-induced cable vibration in the Alamillo cable-stayed bridge (Sevilla, Spain). Assessment and remedial action, Struct. Infrastruct. E, 6, 549, 10.1080/15732470903068607 · DOI
  3. Chen, 2015, Characterization and modeling of a self-sensing MR damper under harmonic loading, Smart Struct. Syst., 15, 1103, 10.12989/sss.2015.15.4.1103 · DOI
  4. Chen, 2004, MR damping system for mitigating wind-rain induced vibration on Dongting Lake cable-stayed bridge, Wind. Struct., 7, 293, 10.12989/was.2004.7.5.293 · DOI
  5. Cheng, 2010, The design of an optimal viscous damper for a bridge stay cable using energy-based approach, J. Sound Vib., 329, 4689, 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.05.027 · DOI
  6. Christenson, 2006, Experimental verification of smart cable damping, J. Eng. Mech., 132, 268, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:3(268) · DOI
  7. Duan, 2005, State-derivative feedback control of cable vibration using semiactive magnetorheological dampers, Comput.-Aided Civ. Inf., 20, 431, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00396.x · DOI
  8. Dyke, 1996, Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction, Smart Mater. Struct., 5, 565, 10.1088/0964-1726/5/5/006 · DOI
  9. Huang, 2012, Vibration mitigation of stay cable using optimally tuned MR damper, Smart Struct. Syst., 9, 35, 10.12989/sss.2012.9.1.035 · DOI
  10. Huang, 1998, The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 454, 903, 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 · DOI
  11. Høgsberg, 2008, Energy dissipation control of magneto-rheological damper, Probabilist. Eng. Mech., 23, 188, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.12.007 · DOI
  12. Johnson, 2007, Semiactive damping of stay cables, J. Eng. Mech., 133, 1, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:1(1) · DOI
  13. Johnson, 2003, Semiactive damping of cables with sag, Comput.-Aided Civ. Inf., 18, 132, 10.1111/1467-8667.00305 · DOI
  14. Krenk, 2000, Vibrations of a taut cable with an external damper, J. Appl. Mech., 67, 772, 10.1115/1.1322037 · DOI
  15. Lam, 2010, A magnetorheological damper capable of force and displacement sensing, Sensors Actuators A, 158, 51, 10.1016/j.sna.2009.12.022 · DOI
  16. Larsen, 2015, Dynamic wind effects on suspension and cable-stayed bridges, J. Sound Vib., 334, 2, 10.1016/j.jsv.2014.06.009 · DOI
  17. Li, 2007, Vibration control of stay cables of the Shandong Binzhou Yellow River Highway Bridge using magnetorheological fluid dampers, J. Bridge Eng., 12, 401, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:4(401) · DOI
  18. Main, 2001, Evaluation of viscous dampers for stay-cable vibration mitigation, J. Bridge Eng., 6, 385, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(385) · DOI
  19. Ni, 2015, Experimental identification of a self-sensing magnetorheological damper using soft computing, J. Eng. Mech., 141, 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000930 · DOI
  20. Ni, 2007, Field observations of rain-wind-induced cable vibration in cable-stayed Dongting Lake Bridge, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 95, 303, 10.1016/j.jweia.2006.07.001 · DOI
  21. Pacheco, 1993, Estimation curve for modal damping in stay cables with viscous damper, J. Struct. Eng., 119, 1961, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:6(1961) · DOI
  22. Phelan, 2006, Full-scale measurements to investigate rain-wind induced cable-stay vibration and its mitigation, J. Bridge Eng., 11, 293, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:3(293) · DOI
  23. Seong, 2009, Damping force control of a vehicle MR damper using a Preisach hysteretic compensator, Smart Mater. Struct., 18, 10.1088/0964-1726/18/7/074008 · DOI
  24. Wang, 2005, Optimal design of viscous dampers for multi-mode vibration control of bridge cables, Eng. Struct., 27, 792, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.12.013 · DOI
  25. Weber, 2015, Robust force tracking control scheme for MR dampers, Struct. Control Health Monit., 22, 1373, 10.1002/stc.1750 · DOI
  26. Weber, 2011, Clipped viscous damping with negative stiffness for semi-active cable damping, Smart Mater. Struct., 20, 10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/045007 · DOI
  27. Weber, 2015a, Amplitude and frequency independent cable damping of Sutong Bridge and Russky Bridge by magnetorheological dampers, Struct. Control Health, 22, 237, 10.1002/stc.1671 · DOI
  28. Weber, 2015b, Semi-active damping with negative stiffness for multi-mode cable vibration mitigation: approximate collocated control solution, Smart Mater. Struct., 24, 10.1088/0964-1726/24/11/115015 · DOI
  29. Weber, 2009, Design of viscous dampers targeting multiple cable modes, Eng. Struct., 31, 2797, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.020 · DOI
  30. Weber, 2005, Measured linear-quadratic-Gaussian controlled damping, Smart Mater. Struct., 14, 1172, 10.1088/0964-1726/14/6/010 · DOI
  31. Weber, 2010, Optimal tuning of amplitude proportional coulomb friction damper for maximum cable damping, J. Struct. Eng., 136, 123, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2010)136:2(123) · DOI
  32. Ying, 2004, A new stochastic optimal control strategy for hysteretic MR dampers, Acta Mech. Solida Sin., 17, 223
  33. Zhou, 2014, Free vibration of taut cable with a damper and a spring, Struct. Control Health, 21, 996, 10.1002/stc.1628 · DOI
  34. Zuo, 2010, Interpretation of field observations of wind- and rain-wind-induced stay cable vibrations, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 98, 73, 10.1016/j.jweia.2009.09.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Z. H., Lam, K. H., & Ni, Y. Q.
Affiliations
  • Southeast University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Z H
  • Lam, K H
  • Ni, Y Q
Venue
Smart Materials and Structures
Published
2016-07-19
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
085019
ISSN
  • 0964-1726 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-665X
OpenAlex
W2479111013
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Smart Materials and Structures (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2016J05123)
  • The Education Department of Fujian Province, China (JA15908)
  • Fuzhou University (XRC-1457)
  • Open Research Fund Program of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Engineering Mechanics, Southeast University (LEM16B08)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Keywords
bridge stay cables, vibration damping, semi-active control, LQG control, collocated control, inclined cables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review