The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate prediction of defect properties in density functional supercell calculations
Open accessAbstract
The theoretical description of defects and impurities in semiconductors is largely based on density functional theory (DFT) employing supercell models. The literature discussion of uncertainties that limit the predictivity of this approach has focused mostly on two issues: (1) finite-size effects, in particular for charged defects; (2) the band-gap problem in local or semi-local DFT approximations. We here describe how finite-size effects (1) in the formation energy of charged defects can be accurately corrected in a simple way, i.e. by potential alignment in conjunction with a scaling of the Madelung-like screened first order correction term. The factor involved with this scaling depends only on the dielectric constant and the shape of the supercell, and quite accurately accounts for the full third order correction according to Makov and Payne. We further discuss in some detail the background and justification for this correction method, and also address the effect of the ionic screening on the magnitude of the image charge energy. In regard to (2) the band-gap problem, we discuss the merits of non-local external potentials that are added to the DFT Hamiltonian and allow for an empirical band-gap correction without significantly increasing the computational demand over that of standard DFT calculations. In combination with LDA + U , these potentials are further instrumental for the prediction of polaronic defects with localized holes in anion-p orbitals, such as the metal-site acceptors in wide-gap oxide semiconductors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Self-citation
Cited by
Electrostatics-based finite-size corrections for first-principles point defect calculations
Kumagai, Y., & Oba, F. (2014) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.89.195205 · Cited by 526
Finite-size supercell correction schemes for charged defect calculations
Komsa, H.-P., Rantala, T. T., & Pasquarello, A. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.045112 · Cited by 494
Extraordinary role of Hg in enhancing the thermoelectric performance of p-type SnTe
Tan, G., Shi, F., Doak, J. W., Sun, H., Zhao, L.-D., Wang, P., Uher, C., Wolverton, C., Dravid, V. P., & Kanatzidis, M. G. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee01463d · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Lany, S., & Zunger, A.
- Venue
- Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-11-23
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 084002
- ISSN
- 0965-0393 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-651X
- OpenAlex
- W2021390897
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate prediction of defect properties in density functional supercell calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0965-0393/17/8/084002
- The paper
- Lany, S., & Zunger, A. (2009). Accurate prediction of defect properties in density functional supercell calculations. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/17/8/084002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.