CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRandom Matrices and Applications

Lorentzian 3d gravity with wormholes via matrix models

Open access
Ambjørn, Jan, Jurkiewicz, Jerzy, Loll, Renate, Vernizzi, Graziano·2001·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/09/022
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/09/022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Lorentzian dynamical triangulation model can be translated into a two-matrix model, the ABAB model; Feynman diagrams correspond to dual graphs of a triangulation, and matrix model amplitudes become particular sums of transfer matrix elements.

    “The Lorentzian dynamical triangulation model can also be translated into a two-matrix model, the so-called ABAB model. The Feynman diagrams of the matrix model correspond to dual graphs of a triangulation, and matrix model amplitudes become particular sums of transfer matrix elements in the gravitational theory [11, 14, 15].”

    From Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions: The Case of a Closed Universe (2005) · cites this paper as [11]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [3][3] H. Kawai, N. Kawamoto, T. Mogami and Y. Watabiki: Transfer matrix formal- ism for two-dimensional quantum gravity and fractal structures of space-time, Phys. Lett. B 306 (1993) 19-26 [hep-th/9302133]. · arXiv
  2. [4][4] J. Ambjørn and Y. Watabiki: Scaling in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 445 (1995) 129-144 [hep-th/9501049]. · arXiv
  3. [6][6] J. Ambjørn and R. Loll: Non-perturbative Lorentzian quantum gravity, causality and topology change, Nucl. Phys. B 536 (1998) 407-434 [hep-th/9805108]. · arXiv
  4. [7][7] J. Ambjørn, K.N. Anagnostopoulos and R. Loll: A new perspective on mat- ter coupling in 2d quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 104035 [hep- th/9904012]. 32 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9302133 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9501049 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9507014 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9507014 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9805108 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9904012 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9904012 · arXiv
  5. [8][8] J. Ambjørn, K.N. Anagnostopoulos and R. Loll: Crossing the c=1 barrier in 2d Lorentzian quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 044010 [hep-lat/9909129]. · arXiv
  6. [9][9] J. Ambjørn, J. Correia, C. Kristjansen and R. Loll: The relation between Eu- clidean and Lorentzian 2D quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 475 (2000) 24-32 [hep-th/9912267]. · arXiv
  7. [10][10] S. Catterall, G. Thorleifsson, M. Bowick and V. John: Scaling and the fractal geometry of two-dimensional quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 354 (1995) 58-68 [hep-lat/9504009]. · arXiv
  8. [13][13] P. Bialas, Z. Burda, A. Krzywicki and B. Petersson: Focusing on the fixed point of 4-d simplicial gravity., Nucl. Phys. B 472 (1996) 293-308 [hep-lat/9601024]. · arXiv
  9. [14][14] R. Loll: Discrete approaches to quantum gravity in four dimensions, Living Rev. Rel. 1, 13 (1998), http://www.livingreviews.org [gr-qc/9805049]. · arXiv
  10. [15][15] J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll: A nonperturbative Lorentzian path in- tegral for gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 924-927 [hep-th/0002050]. · arXiv
  11. [16][16] J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll: Dynamically triangulating Lorentzian quantum gravity, preprint Golm AEI-2001-049 [hep-th/0105267]. · arXiv
  12. [17][17] R. Loll: Discrete Lorentzian quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 94 (2001) 96-107 [hep-th/0011194]. · arXiv
  13. [18][18] J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll: Nonperturbative 3d Lorentzian quantum gravity., to appear in Phys. Rev. D [hep-th/0011276]. · arXiv
  14. [19][19] J. Ambjørn, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll: Computer simulations of 3d Lorentzian quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 94 (2001) 689-692 [hep- lat/0011055].
  15. [20][20] V.A. Kazakov and P. Zinn-Justin: Two matrix model with ABAB interaction, Nucl. Phys. B 546 (1999) 647-668 [hep-th/9808043]. · arXiv
  16. [21][21] Y. Watabiki: Construction of noncritical string field theory by transfer matrix formalism in dynamical triangulation, Nucl. Phys. B 441 (1995) 119-166 [hep- th/9401096]. 33 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9909129 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9912267 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9504009 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9601024 http://www.livingreviews.org http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9805049 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0002050 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0105267 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011194 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0011276 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0011055 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0011055 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9808043 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9401096 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9401096 · arXiv
  17. [23][23] A. Dasgupta and R. Loll: A proper-time cure for the conformal sickness in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B, to appear [hep-th/0103186]. · arXiv
  18. [26][26] P. Di Francesco, E. Guitter and C. Kristjansen: Integrable 2-d Lorentzian gravi- ty and random walks, Nucl. Phys. B 567 (2000) 515-553 [hep-th/9907084]; Gen- eralized Lorentzian gravity and the Calogero Hamiltonian, preprint SACLAY- SPHT-T00-145 [hep-th/0010259]. · arXiv
  19. [28][28] G.P. Korchemsky: Loops in the curvature matrix model, Phys. Lett. B 296 (1992) 323-334 [hep-th/9206088]. · arXiv
  20. [29][29] L. Chekhov and C. Kristjansen: Hermitian matrix model with plaquette inter- action, Nucl. Phys. B 479 (1996) 683-696 [hep-th/9605013]. · arXiv
  21. [32][32] I.K. Kostov and M. Staudacher: Multicritical phases of the O(n) model on a random lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 384 (1992) 459-483 [hep-th/9203030]. · arXiv
  22. [34][34] B. Durhuus: Multi-spin systems on a randomly triangulated surface, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 203-222 [hep-th/9402052]. · arXiv
  23. [35][35] J. Ambjørn, B. Durhuus and T. Jonsson: A solvable 2-d gravity model with γ > 0, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9 (1994) 1221-1228 [hep-th/9401137]. · arXiv
  24. [36][36] I.R. Klebanov: Touching random surfaces and Liouville gravity, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1836-1841 [hep-th/9407167]. 34 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9511117 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9511117 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0103186 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9907084 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0010259 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206088 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9605013 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9203030 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9402052 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9401137 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9407167 · arXiv
  25. [38][38] J.L.F. Barbon, K. Demeterfi, I.R. Klebanov and C. Schmidhuber: Correlation functions in matrix models modified by wormhole terms, Nucl. Phys. B 440 (1995) 189-214 [hep-th/9501058]. · arXiv
  26. [39][39] T. Jonsson and J.F. Wheater: The spectral dimension of the branched polymer phase of two-dimensional quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 515 (1998) 549-574 [hep-lat/9710024]. · arXiv
  27. [40][40] J. Ambjørn, D. Boulatov, J.L. Nielsen, J. Rolf and Y. Watabiki: The spectral dimension of 2-d quantum gravity, JHEP 9802:010 (1998) [hep-th/9801099]. · arXiv
  28. [41][41] V.A. Kazakov, M. Staudacher and T. Wynter: Exact solution of discrete two- dimensional R2 gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 471, (1996) 309-333 [hep-th/9601069]; Almost flat planar diagrams, Commun. Math. Phys. 179 (1996) 235-256 [hep- th/9506174]; Character expansion methods for matrix models of dually weighted graphs, Commun. Math. Phys. 177 (1996) 451-468 [hep-th/9502132]; P. Zinn-Justin, Random hermitian matrices in an external field, Nucl. Phys. B 497 (1997) 725-732 [cond-mat/9703033]. · arXiv
  29. [42][42] P. Zinn-Justin: The six-vertex model on random lattices, Europhys. Lett. 50 (2000) 15-21 [cond-mat/9909250]. · arXiv
  30. [43][43] S. Carlip: Statistical mechanics of the (2+1)-dimensional black hole, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 2853-2879 [gr-qc/9409052]; O. Coussaert, M. Henneaux and P. van Driel: The asymptotic dynamics of three-dimensional Einstein gravity with a negative cosmological constant, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 2961-2966 [gr-qc/9506019]. · arXiv
  31. [44][44] J. Maldacena and A. Strominger: Statistical entropy of de Sitter space, JHEP 9802:014 (1998) [gr-qc/9801096]; M. Bañados, T. Brotz and M.E. Ortiz: Quantum three-dimensional de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 046002 [hep-th/9807216]. · arXiv
  32. [571]571. [hep-th/9807216]. · arXiv
  33. [46][46] J.B. Hartle and R. Sorkin: Boundary terms in the action for the Regge calculus, Gen. Rel. Grav. 13 (1981) 541-549. 35 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9409064 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9409064 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9501058 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9710024 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9801099 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9601069 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9506174 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9506174 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9502132 http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9703033 http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9909250 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9409052 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9506019 http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9801096 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9807216 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9807216 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ambjørn, J., Jurkiewicz, J., Loll, R., & Vernizzi, G.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-09-13
Volume
2001
Issue
09
Pages
022-022
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1088/1126-6708/2001/09/022
OpenAlex
W2061798429
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
European Social Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Random Matrices and Applications
Keywords
wormholes, two-matrix model, Hermitian matrix model, phase structure, strong coupling phase, non-perturbative gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review